Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • zhlingl
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 1

    Questions on cutoff setting of FPKM value & know genes filtering in Cuffmerge result

    Hello~

    I am running the Tuxedo protocol and trying to discover novel transcripts from RNA-seq data of several samples of mouse. As said in the protocol, I mapped the reads for each sample to the reference genome using Tophat (with -G parameter specified to guide the mapping process), and then assembled transcripts for each sample using Cufflinks (with -b and -u parameters specified to enable bias correction).

    After that I ran Cuffmerge on all sample assembies to create a merged transcriptome (with -g and -s parameters specified). I would like to set a cutoff on the FPKM value to filter low expression transcripts(or background noise) for further investigation, but the FPKM values in the Cuffmerge output "transcripts.gtf" file seem to range from 0 to 1, even though the corresponding FPKM values in each separate sample assembly (the Cufflinks output "transcript.gtf" file) may present at the level of hundreds or even thousands. Did Cuffmerge go through some kind of normalization? Information on cuffmerge output in Cufflinks official website is very limited:

    cuffmerge Output

    cuffmerge produces a GTF file that contains an assembly that merges together the input assemblies.

    <outprefix>/merged.gtf
    So if I would stick to my plan and run the cuffmerge result through the FPKM filter, what value would be a appropriate threshold? Or should I apply the filter on each sample assembly (which will lead to another question that whether to keep or to leave out a transcript that is high expressed in one sample and low expressed in another)? Or should I use the combined.gtf from cuffcompare output instead?


    Another thing is puzzling me is that if I want to filer out known genes(those annotated in UCSC,for example), can I feed the transcripts.gtf file previously built by cuffmerge and a GTF file that contain information on these genes to cuffcompare, and simply cross out transcripts marked with "class code" =, c, j, e in the resulting <outprefix>.tracking file(or otherwise keep those with "class code" u) ?

    Class Codes

    If you ran cuffcompare with the -r option, tracking rows will contain the following values. If you did not use -r, the rows will all contain "-" in their class code column.
    Priority Code Description
    1 = Complete match of intron chain
    2 c Contained
    3 j Potentially novel isoform (fragment): at least one splice junction is shared with a reference transcript
    4 e Single exon transfrag overlapping a reference exon and at least 10 bp of a reference intron, indicating a possible pre-mRNA fragment.
    5 i A transfrag falling entirely within a reference intron
    6 o Generic exonic overlap with a reference transcript
    7 p Possible polymerase run-on fragment (within 2Kbases of a reference transcript)
    8 r Repeat. Currently determined by looking at the soft-masked reference sequence and applied to transcripts where at least 50% of the bases are lower case
    9 u Unknown, intergenic transcript
    10 x Exonic overlap with reference on the opposite strand
    11 s An intron of the transfrag overlaps a reference intron on the opposite strand (likely due to read mapping errors)
    12 . (.tracking file only, indicates multiple classifications)
    Any suggestion would be greatly appreciated~

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
    by SEQadmin2



    Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
    ...
    07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
    by SEQadmin2



    Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

    There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
    07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
0 responses
20 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
0 responses
30 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
0 responses
17 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
0 responses
34 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...