![]() |
|
|||||||
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Analysis of Gro-seq data | sikidiri | General | 4 | 03-08-2012 07:10 AM |
| RNA-Seq Data Analysis Course | uday_dd | RNA Sequencing | 0 | 11-20-2011 10:41 PM |
| Free Partek RNA-Seq & ChIP-Seq Data Analysis Workshops | mgabrielli@partek.com | Events / Conferences | 0 | 04-05-2011 07:28 AM |
| ChIP-Seq: Enabling Data Analysis on High-Throughput Data in Large Data Depository Usi | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 0 | 12-15-2010 02:00 AM |
| Tag-Seq Data Analysis | Tagz | RNA Sequencing | 4 | 05-26-2010 04:49 AM |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Location: Beijing Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 14
|
Hi,
Has anyone ever played with the MNase-seq datasets? I got some mouse datasets running but there seems several points should take into consideration: 1. repetitive region: as about 50% of genome is repetitive sequence and these can arise those multiple alignments during the mapping stage. Generally, only uniquely mapped reads were filtered out for the downstream analysis, which means we lost about 50% region's information of the genome. That's critical if we want to see how about the repeat regions happened in the cell. I don't know if anyone did similar analysis and added the multi-reads and how to process them. 2. input signal: in general ChIP-seq data, the control might generates some peak signal and one of the reason arise this is due to the open chromatin structure. But in this case, say, if I notice the input sharp signal, still, that might be due to the open chromatin in that region, yet might also be generated due to other unknown reason. Has anyone also crush similar problem and how to process them? 3. peak callor choice: there are several peak callers for the mononucleosome calling, I'm just wondering whether MACS can also accomplish this if I'm not only interested in the mononucleosome peaks. Welcome any kinds of communications and suggestions. Thanks! lix |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
Senior Member
Location: 45°30'25.22"N / 9°15'53.00"E Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 254
|
Hello there
Quote:
Quote:
HTH d |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Location: Boston Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 23
|
Quote:
python2.7 danpos.py tagAlign1-tagAlign2 -k 1 danpos version 2.0.1 command: python danpos.py tagAlign1-tagAlign2 -k 1 Namespace(bg=None, clonalcut=1e-10, count=None, distance=100, edge=0, extend=80, fs=None, gapfill=0, height=5, keep=1, lmd=300, mafrsz=250, mifrsz=50, name='result', nor='F', paired=0, path='chr22.Gm12878.nuc.tagAlign-chr22.K562.nuc.tagAlign', pcfer=0, smooth_width=20, span=10, statis='P', testcut=1e-05, width=40) time elasped: 0.36073589325 seconds normalizing wigs ... less than 2 datasets, no normalization to be done saving normalized wigs ... time elasped: 0.360930919647 seconds pooling each group ... Traceback (most recent call last): File "danpos.py", line 125, in <module> runDANPOS() File "danpos.py", line 122, in runDANPOS smooth_width=args.smooth_width,paired=args.paired) File "functions.py", line 262, in danpos pooledgroups[groupname]=groups[groupname].pop(filenames[0]) IndexError: list index out of range Am I missing something in terms of being able to tell DANPOS that these are the two files I want to compare nucleosomal positioning data on? Please help, urgent |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|