![]() |
|
|||||||

Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ChIP-seq library prep Illumina Kapa | ETHANol | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 3 | 11-19-2012 11:42 AM |
| Nextera vs Illumina Library Prep | maggie | Illumina/Solexa | 6 | 03-01-2012 06:01 PM |
| Problems with Invitrogen Size Select E-gels for Illumina RNA-Seq Library Sample Prep? | Jerry Glenn | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 0 | 04-18-2011 07:14 AM |
| Illumina PE library prep with AmpureXP | lboston | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 5 | 01-19-2011 10:11 AM |
| Nextera vs Illumina Library Prep | maggie | Illumina/Solexa | 2 | 12-30-2010 09:58 AM |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Location: UK Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22
|
Apologies if this has been answered elsewhere, but I've had a glance through the threads and can't see anything obvious.
I've noted that Illumina's TruSeq kits are incompatible with BS-seq at present because the polymerase mix cannot tolerate uracil. My query is how much of an issue this is to sort out? Is it just a case of finding a different Taq for the library amplification (KAPA do one that seems suitable), or does this also affect the polymerases used to conduct end-repair? What about the polymerases in the SBS chemistry? We'd be wanting to prepare these for a run on a HiScanSQ. Thanks, Matt |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Location: Australia Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 105
|
Publications eg http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19829295 generally use PhuTurboCx for the library prep PCR - as this replaces the uracils with thymidines the enzyme used in SBS, though I assume there are some tricks with basecalling etc bisulfite-seq due to the base composition imbalance - an experienced service provider should be fine with this though.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|