Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pmiguel
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 2328

    #1

    MiSeq vs HiSeq cluster densities

    Those of you have just gotten MiSeq and intending to use them to help dial in cluster densities for their HiSeqs, check your MyIllumina: Bulletin. Especially

    Cluster efficiency – Due to differences in the cluster generation chemistry, the MiSeq flowcells typically cluster at approximately 50% higher cluster density than the same library concentration loaded on a HiSeq flow cell (i.e. a library concentration that yields 750/mm2 clusters on a MiSeq will result in approximately 500/mm2 on a HiSeq).
    Can anyone support or contradict this? We just got the MiSeqs, so this would be mission critical for us. I guess we tend to load our HiSeq (or, previously, HiScanSQ) at 12 pM [wrong, it was loaded at 10 pM] (assay by SYBR-green KAPA qPCR with Illumina phiX as our concentration standard.) That tended to land us in the 600-800 Kclusters/mm^2 on the HiScanSQ. On the HiSeq, the phiX control lanes at 12 pM came in way low (450 K clusters/mm^2) whereas the libraries we titrated with them came in higher than expected: 700-1100K clusters/mm^2. But that could just be normal variation.

    --
    Phillip
    Last edited by pmiguel; 05-05-2012, 06:21 AM. Reason: Corrected loading concentration of phiX used.
  • Heisman
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 534

    #2
    Originally posted by pmiguel View Post
    Those of you have just gotten MiSeq and intending to use them to help dial in cluster densities for their HiSeqs, check your MyIllumina: Bulletin. Especially



    Can anyone support or contradict this? We just got the MiSeqs, so this would be mission critical for us. I guess we tend to load our HiSeq (or, previously, HiScanSQ) at 12 pM (assay by SYBR-green KAPA qPCR with Illumina phiX as our concentration standard.) That tended to land us in the 600-800 Kclusters/mm^2 on the HiScanSQ. On the HiSeq, the phiX control lanes at 12 pM came in way low (450 K clusters/mm^2) whereas the libraries we titrated with them came in higher than expected: 700-1100K clusters/mm^2. But that could just be normal variation.

    --
    Phillip
    Our sequencing core has used a 1:1.4 ratio between MiSeq:HiSeq (similar to the 1:1.5 ratio you posted above), and they are considering going even higher in their recommendations. Not being part of the core I can't really give details beyond that.

    Comment

    • megalodon
      Member
      • Sep 2010
      • 20

      #3
      Hi Philip,

      we have followed Illumina's recommendation of using a 1:1.5 ratio between MiSeq:HiSeq and by doing that, we have been achieving roughly the same cluster densities on the HiSeq as for previous MiSeq runs for the same sample.

      Daniela

      Comment

      • RPiddock
        Lab Monkey
        • Jun 2011
        • 16

        #4
        We've been loading our MiSeq at 6pM and HiSeq at 10pM and getting good results, so very similar all round.

        Rachel

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
          by SEQadmin2



          CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

          Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
          ...
          07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
          by SEQadmin2


          Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

          The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
          ...
          07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:13 AM
        0 responses
        13 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
        0 responses
        24 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
        0 responses
        19 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
        0 responses
        18 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...