Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TheStudent
    Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 10

    Enough reads in Chip-Seq?

    Dear Community,

    I am new to ChIP-seq so please be gentle.

    Analyzing ChIP-seq data - public and from my collaborators - I realized that the minimum of reads is varying very much - NCBI's minimum to submit ChIP-seq is 1 million short reads I heard and I saw published data with even less than that.

    Looking at the distribution of reads in UCSC browser (by uploading the .bam files) it looks very random over the whole genome, sometimes reads are stacking up a bit.

    Here the questions:

    A) Should you normally be able to spot peaks visually?
    The peak callers take into account fragment size as well I suppose, but usually should you be able to see distinct peaks by eye?

    B) If not - if it looks all over the genome, does that mean that there are not enough reads to detect peaks reliable?

    C) How many reads would you recommend minimum for Illumina GAIIx - read length 37 - 42nt for TFs like Myc-n or NFkB-p50?

    Thank you very much
  • ffinkernagel
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 110

    #2
    A) Very much so.
    B) Either that or your ChIP did not work.
    C) Very much depends on the antibody, and the portion of the genome covered by your factor. For those two, I'd start at minimum of 20 million reads, but I'd expect a need to increase the depth.

    Comment

    • TheStudent
      Member
      • Nov 2011
      • 10

      #3
      thanks,

      It is expected that those factors bind a lot in the genome

      Comment

      • ffinkernagel
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2009
        • 110

        #4
        Indeed - but then at least for myc I know that the antibody is pretty decent.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        24 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        41 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
        0 responses
        48 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
        0 responses
        49 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...