Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • edge
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 199

    #1

    Discussion about MIRA hybrid assembly of 454 reads with Illumina unpaired data

    I got a 454 file named as Read.454.fasta and another two more file named as Illumina_unpaired_read.solexa.fasta and Illumina_unpaired_read.solexa.fasta.qual
    How should I do or type to let the MIRA program to the hybrid assembly of these 454 reads with Illumina reads.
    I got read the this manual:

    Unfortunately, it can't help me a lot to solve my problem.
    Thanks a lot for all of your help and explanation. Kindly told me if I still need other extra info_file for MIRA to run properly.
    Thanks again
  • edge
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 199

    #2
    I feel a bit confusing by using MIRA's "De-novo hybrid assemblies".
    For example, I got a bacteria genome which sequencing by 454 technique and Illumina technique separately.
    After run 454 reads by using MIRA and BAMBUS, I extract the longest scaffold and treat it as a backbone. I hope that I able to polish this longest scaffold by using Illumina reads to get better assembly result.
    I just confusing how to use MIRA to polish my longest scaffold and get better assembly result.
    Thanks again for everybody.
    Hope that who experience or familiar at MIRA can help me solve my troubles.
    Kindly to remind me if I have done any mistakes when deal with MIRA to De-novo hybrid assemblies.

    Comment

    • Mira
      Junior Member
      • Nov 2009
      • 3

      #3
      I also try to assemble a relatively small bacteria genome by using de-novo hybrid assembly (454 and Illumina). Unfortunately it seems that the program (or the computer) is overloaded with 3.5 mio reads (Illumina - 36bp each) and 45.000 reads of 454. Normally the computer works well, so I am searching for the mistake. What can I do? Any ideas?
      Thanks in advance,
      Mira

      Comment

      • sklages
        Senior Member
        • May 2008
        • 628

        #4
        What is "overloaded", what is "normally" and what is "the computer"? This is not very specific for troubleshooting ;-)

        Sven

        Comment

        • Mira
          Junior Member
          • Nov 2009
          • 3

          #5
          Thank you for the quick reply
          I have a computer running with linux (64 bit), 4 GB RAM and additionally 8 GB SWAP. It took less than 24 hours with 1.6 million reads of illumina and 47.000 of 454. I guess the processing time mainly depends on the number of illumina reads. Maybe I am a bit impatient. I am really looking forward to the results. Do you have any idea how long it will take with the same amount of 454 reads, but approx. the double amount of illumina reads?

          Comment

          • Mira
            Junior Member
            • Nov 2009
            • 3

            #6
            Hey,

            now I have the answer. It took appr. 3 days.

            Anyway, thanks a lot.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
            0 responses
            21 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
            0 responses
            18 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            36 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            42 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...