Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • acpetterson
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 1

    TruSeq Library Pooling - Balanced Indexes?

    Hi:

    I typically pool 6 TruSeq libraries with P5/P7 adapter pairs (2 4 5 6 7 12) per lane, as per Illumina's recommended pooling for balanced indexes.

    I need to pool 8 libraries, and am having a difficult time finding the pooling strategy recommended for this number. Does anyone have experience with this strategy? In my notes from Illumina, I only have recommendations for 2, 3, 4, and 6 pooled libraries.

    Thanks,

    ap
  • pmiguel
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 2328

    #2
    Don't sweat it. Above 6 indexes you have to work to create an imbalance that would throw the instrument software off. If you are feeling paranoid, use your balance pool of 6 indexes and spike in any other 2 at about the same molar amount.

    --
    Phillip

    Comment

    • NextGenSeq
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2009
      • 482

      #3
      Isn't this only a problem with dual indexing?

      Comment

      • pmiguel
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2008
        • 2328

        #4
        Originally posted by NextGenSeq View Post
        Isn't this only a problem with dual indexing?
        Why would it be? (I haven't done any dual indexing runs yet.)

        --
        Phillip

        Comment

        • snorberg
          Junior Member
          • Jan 2013
          • 5

          #5
          You are free to use whatever indexes you like.

          Refer to Illumina's "Low-Plex Pooling Guidelines with TruSeq DNA or RNA Sample Prep v2". For pooling 5-11 libraries, it recommends using one of the 4-plex options + any other indexes.

          Best, Steve

          Comment

          • share
            Member
            • Mar 2011
            • 14

            #6
            Why don't you use illumina's experiment manager? We use it always.

            Comment

            • pmiguel
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2008
              • 2328

              #7
              Originally posted by share View Post
              Why don't you use illumina's experiment manager? We use it always.
              I tried it out when first launched. I could feel my brain starting to bleed after a few minutes. I stopped at that point, hopefully before a great deal of irreversible damage was done.

              If I were starting from scratch, I would probably use it. But we already have our own methods to generate sample sheets tied in to our sample tracking software.

              --
              Phillip

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                by SEQadmin2


                Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.

                Probing...
                Today, 11:10 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                by SEQadmin2



                Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                Yesterday, 05:17 AM
              • GATTACAT
                Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by GATTACAT
                Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:04 AM
              0 responses
              7 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
              0 responses
              6 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
              0 responses
              9 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
              0 responses
              31 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...