Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • marcowanger
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2008
    • 273

    Invited ECO via PM for his opinion on this.

    Dear Eric,

    Approaching the final phase of preparation to publish SEQanswers, we need your opinion in choosing the appropriate journal.

    Would you please leave your comment in http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthr...7405#post57405

    Thanks.

    With regards,
    Marco
    Marco

    Comment

    • ulz_peter
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2010
      • 219

      What do you think Marco?

      Comment

      • marcowanger
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2008
        • 273

        Originally posted by ulz_peter View Post
        What do you think Marco?
        I consider possibility.


        original goal (1):
        It seems either Nature / Science is hard. Unless we find some articles there that discuss community science. Then we can refer to that article and reply with what we have written.

        If in case we find none, then (2):

        I do not have personal preference. But of course, the wider the reader's base, the better. I think Genome Biology, Genome Medicine, PloS CompBio are both good choices.

        Just leave the format or words limit alone first.

        I suggest emailing the editors pre-inquiry emails.
        Marco

        Comment

        • ulz_peter
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2010
          • 219

          So there is an article in Nature about community science:

          Technology: The inspiration exchange

          Chris Lintott

          Nature, 478, 320–321 (20 October 2011) doi:10.1038/478320a

          Published online
          19 October 2011

          Which is not too long ago, but there is the 3-author limit on the correspondence and I guess the letter doesn't really fit in the perspectives part. I'm looking for something similar in Science...

          Comment

          • Joann
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2008
            • 230

            editing suggestions, text, title, cover letter

            Hi all,

            For the section on implications--I could shorten it to:

            "As the accelerated flow of technology development has dwarfted traditional peer reviewed information sharing, the computationally-abled HTS community has successfully connected itself by means of the electronic scientific forum, SEQanswers, since 2007."

            The wonderful word data analysis give rise to a possible title:

            "SeqAnswers, Reading Biological Sequences as a Community since 2007."

            And I would like to see the letter in a general science journal such as Science because of its importance. Please submit and ask in the cover letter to waive the existing format.

            Comment

            • adaptivegenome
              Super Moderator
              • Nov 2009
              • 436

              Originally posted by ulz_peter View Post
              So my choice is for Genome Medicine or Genome Biology. You didn't state the limitations for publishing in one of those journals. Are there any regarding word count or number of authors?
              Neither journal restricts authors and they are both open access journals so there would be a fee (depending on who submits the manuscript; and also this fee can be waived in some cases). An Opinion article would be 1500-3000 words which I think fits nicely for our topic. I would go for a shorter length (closer to 1500) and then go for more figures; particularly the two figures Rob came up with.

              There are some other formats we could also shoot for, such as "Method" or "Database"; however given that the draft is more focused on showcasing a new way of doing science, I would think an "Opinion" would be a great format. A traditional "Review" format would be too long and I think ill-suited for our goals.
              Last edited by adaptivegenome; 11-21-2011, 06:38 AM. Reason: typo

              Comment

              • adaptivegenome
                Super Moderator
                • Nov 2009
                • 436

                Originally posted by Joann View Post
                Hi all,

                For the section on implications--I could shorten it to:

                "As the accelerated flow of technology development has dwarfted traditional peer reviewed information sharing, the computationally-abled HTS community has successfully connected itself by means of the electronic scientific forum, SEQanswers, since 2007."

                The wonderful word data analysis give rise to a possible title:

                "SeqAnswers, Reading Biological Sequences as a Community since 2007."

                And I would like to see the letter in a general science journal such as Science because of its importance. Please submit and ask in the cover letter to waive the existing format.
                I don't think that our paper will work in Science/Nature. But that is just my opinion. In addition to Genome Biology or Genome Medicine we could shoot for PLOS Biology which is both highly ranked and also widely read (not as much as Nature... but they could be sympathetic to our cause as they have obviously pushed for open science, etc.)

                I agree with Marco we should simply send off presubmission inquiries to see who is interested. I would be willing to contact Genome Medicine if there is interest from everyone as I know someone people there...

                BTW: Joann, I like that title. We might try for something a little more aggressive than "reading"... for example "decoding" or "interpreting", but it is a great title.
                Last edited by adaptivegenome; 11-21-2011, 06:45 AM. Reason: typo

                Comment

                • Joann
                  Senior Member
                  • Oct 2008
                  • 230

                  Hi genericforms,
                  The title is strictly data based, upon some top word counts from the forum. As a generalist, I like to promote wider scientific exposure. Also, I am wanting to see exactly how many times the question "What's a paired-end read?" gets posted on the forum by a newbie.

                  Comment

                  • adaptivegenome
                    Super Moderator
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 436

                    Originally posted by Joann View Post
                    Hi genericforms,
                    The title is strictly data based, upon some top word counts from the forum. As a generalist, I like to promote wider scientific exposure. Also, I am wanting to see exactly how many times the question "What's a paired-end read?" gets posted on the forum by a newbie.
                    Clever title then!

                    Comment

                    • ulz_peter
                      Senior Member
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 219

                      Agree with genericforms: great title!!

                      Comment

                      • adaptivegenome
                        Super Moderator
                        • Nov 2009
                        • 436

                        Originally posted by ulz_peter View Post
                        Agree with genericforms: great title!!
                        Maybe we can work a discussion of the title into the paper?

                        Comment

                        • Joann
                          Senior Member
                          • Oct 2008
                          • 230

                          Originally posted by genericforms View Post
                          Maybe we can work a discussion of the title into the paper?
                          Certainly into full length version of a paper(s). Also I am so pleased that "quality" is another top expression--both in the field and around this forum in particular, and proven of course by the word data.

                          Comment

                          • adobrovic
                            Junior Member
                            • May 2011
                            • 5

                            Given the number of times that the article is getting to get cited, and the consequent effect on the journals impact factor, it may be possible to get the journal to waive publication/open access fees.

                            Comment

                            • ECO
                              --Site Admin--
                              • Oct 2007
                              • 1360

                              Originally posted by genericforms View Post
                              I don't think that our paper will work in Science/Nature.
                              While I like setting ambitious goals, I tend to agree.

                              I agree with Marco we should simply send off presubmission inquiries to see who is interested. I would be willing to contact Genome Medicine if there is interest from everyone as I know someone people there...
                              This is my vote. Presubmission inquiry to several journals to test the waters.

                              Comment

                              • adaptivegenome
                                Super Moderator
                                • Nov 2009
                                • 436

                                Originally posted by ECO View Post
                                This is my vote. Presubmission inquiry to several journals to test the waters.
                                I will contact Genome Medicine tomorrow. Can someone else take care of the other journal suggestions? I think from the thread people suggested:

                                Genome Biology
                                PLOS Biology
                                PLOS Computional Biology

                                Were there other journals I might have missed? Also we will obviously need to act quickly with respect to finalizing the authors, title, and content if we are pre-approved...

                                Comment

                                Latest Articles

                                Collapse

                                • GATTACAT
                                  Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                                  by GATTACAT
                                  Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                                  Today, 11:43 AM
                                • SEQadmin2
                                  Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                                  by SEQadmin2


                                  I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                                  Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                                  06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
                                • SEQadmin2
                                  From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
                                  by SEQadmin2


                                  Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


                                  The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
                                  ...
                                  06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

                                ad_right_rmr

                                Collapse

                                News

                                Collapse

                                Topics Statistics Last Post
                                Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 05:37 AM
                                0 responses
                                7 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                                0 responses
                                17 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                                0 responses
                                52 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
                                0 responses
                                110 views
                                0 reactions
                                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                                Working...