Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rocketknight
    Member
    • Sep 2011
    • 86

    #16
    Hey, sorry to dredge this thread up again, but I have another question! Illumina recommend a double-Ampure cleanup after ligation with a 1:1 ratio of Ampure. This confused me way back when I started this thread, but now I realize that as well as cleaning up the reaction this is also a way of removing DNA below about 140bp - adapters and adapter dimers, in other words.

    So here's my next question: Can I save time by doing a different cleanup at this step (e.g. QIAQuick PCR Purification) if I'm going to do downstream exome capture? I'm assuming that the exome capture step will be largely unaffected by the adapter dimers. Or have I overlooked something?

    Comment

    • Heisman
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 534

      #17
      Small amounts of adapter dimers will probably not be too damaging, but how much time do you really save by doing a QIAQuick PCR Purification over an Ampure XP Bead cleanup? It can't be more than 5 minutes. Is that worth deviating from the protocol when you are going to do a capture for probably at least 24 hours?

      Comment

      • Rocketknight
        Member
        • Sep 2011
        • 86

        #18
        It's just me being lazy, but two consecutive Ampure cleanups take about an hour and a half with Illumina's recommended incubation and drying times, compared to about ten minutes to column-purify.

        But yeah, you're right. If there's any uncertainty I'll stick with the Ampure method.

        Comment

        • Heisman
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 534

          #19
          I don't know what Illumina recommends, but it's probably unnecessary. Mix beads with sample, vortex vigorously, 5 minute incubation, pellet beads with magnet, discard supernatant, add in 70-80% EtOH (enough to cover the beads), discard the EtOH, repeat the wash, discard the EtOH, suck out residual EtOH at the bottom of the tube with a fine-tipped pipette, place tube in heat block for a few minutes, add in water/TE to elute, vortex and incubate for 2 minutes, then transfer out. Whole process never takes me more than 20-25 minutes if I'm trying to get done quickly and only am working with a few tubes.

          Another idea (that I have not tried) is to mix in the beads for the first cleanup, do the vortext/5 minute incubation step, discard supernatant, do one wash with 70-80% EtOH, discard the EtOH, and then directly add in the beads for the second cleanup and continue from there.

          Comment

          • Rocketknight
            Member
            • Sep 2011
            • 86

            #20
            Awesome, but do you lose much DNA from the shorter Ampure incubation time? I feel like not all of it would have precipitated after 5 minutes.

            Comment

            • Heisman
              Senior Member
              • Dec 2010
              • 534

              #21
              I don't lose more DNA, I don't think. You can test this very easily of course.

              Comment

              • theduke
                Member
                • Aug 2010
                • 14

                #22
                Originally posted by Rocketknight View Post

                So here's my next question: Can I save time by doing a different cleanup at this step (e.g. QIAQuick PCR Purification) if I'm going to do downstream exome capture? I'm assuming that the exome capture step will be largely unaffected by the adapter dimers. Or have I overlooked something?
                I just tried this, but the adapter carryover was way too high. The Qiagen columns have a size cut-off of around 70 bp, so I'm not sure its the way to go post-ligation. I have cut the Ampure clean-up to just a single round though because I don't want to lose too much mononucelosomal DNA (this is for ChIP-Seq) and that looks perfectly fine on HS DNA chips, especially when you combine it with Ethanols pre-size selection PCR to convert the Y-shaped adapters.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • GATTACAT
                  Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by GATTACAT
                  Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                  Yesterday, 11:43 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by SEQadmin2


                  I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                  Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                  06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
                  by SEQadmin2


                  Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


                  The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
                  ...
                  06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
                0 responses
                9 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                0 responses
                18 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                0 responses
                52 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
                0 responses
                110 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...