I am doing a TruSeq smallRNA library prep. When I was doing Ligate 3' adapter, and came to adding the STP step, the tube in the kit was empty (Illumina glitch). Illumina said to keep samples at -80 and shipped me the STP. Then I continued. When I checked BioA traces (see attached) the band is not where it should be. So it did not work and I will have to repeat. Any suggestions/feedback if you have any experience with this library prep.
Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
small RNA library
See attached. Sample was purified when given to me and hence checked on smallRNA chip and BioA conc. was close to the conc. by Qubit microRNA assay. I used a human brain total RNA as control while preparing libraries.Attached Files
Comment
-
The RNA looks good to me, but the libraries seem to be just adapter-dimer. How much RNA input did you use?
Also, I would like to mention that the TruSeq kit is about the worst Small RNA-Seq kit you can get, at least in terms of cost and data quality. I highly recommend you check out the NEXTflex Small RNA Sequencing Kit v3, as it uses randomized adapters to reduce ligase bias and therefore generate more accurate data and greater discovery/detection rates, it includes completely gel-free or low-input options, and it is much more cost effective.
As a disclaimer, I work for Bioo Scientific.
Comment
-
message
Originally posted by kerplunk412 View PostThe RNA looks good to me, but the libraries seem to be just adapter-dimer. How much RNA input did you use?
Also, I would like to mention that the TruSeq kit is about the worst Small RNA-Seq kit you can get, at least in terms of cost and data quality. I highly recommend you check out the NEXTflex Small RNA Sequencing Kit v3, as it uses randomized adapters to reduce ligase bias and therefore generate more accurate data and greater discovery/detection rates, it includes completely gel-free or low-input options, and it is much more cost effective.
As a disclaimer, I work for Bioo Scientific.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sajoshi View PostI just send you a message asking a question. Please let me know.
Also, to be fair I should mention some of the other kits out there and the pros and cons.
NEB: Cost effective, lower bias than TruSeq, but substantially more bias than NEXTflex (Bioo)
TriLink: Cost effective (I think), streamlined protocol with no gel size selection required, but similar bias as TruSeq
Clontech: Uses poly(A) tailing and template switching RT to eliminate ligation steps, thereby reducing bias. Shows slightly less bias than NEXTflex kit, but mapping rates to miRNA are very low, leading to lower overall detection/discovery rates in total RNA samples. This makes sense, as other than size selection there is no way to select for miRNA as there is with ligation-based kit. I think this protocol is also pretty streamlined.
Comment
-
TriLink has indeed modified the adapters to greatly reduce adapter-dimer formation, but I am not sure exactly how it works. In my experience their kit works well but still has big issues with bias.
A peak at ~60 bp is most likely excess PCR primer and will not interfere with clustering, as it will not be able to amplify on the flow cell.
Comment
-
Unless there is a large amount of excess PCR primer compared to actual library product it should not occupy enough primers on the flow cell to make any difference. The flow cell has enough primers on it to allow single library molecules to make clusters of about 1,000 strands (according to Wikipedia) through bridge amplification, so since the excess PCR primer is not amplified the number of primer sites it occupies on the flow cell will be negligible.
Comment
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by seqadmin
Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...-
Channel: Articles
04-04-2024, 04:25 PM -
-
by seqadmin
Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...-
Channel: Articles
03-22-2024, 06:39 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
|
0 responses
24 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
|
0 responses
25 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
|
0 responses
21 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
|
0 responses
52 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
|
Comment