SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > Illumina/Solexa



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ATAC-seq with 2x150 kevin199011 Sample Prep / Library Generation 1 03-14-2018 10:55 AM
Atac-Seq - Side qPCR question - cycle number JP_seq Sample Prep / Library Generation 0 11-16-2017 06:34 AM
cut 5' and 3' ends of paired-ends reads sebl Bioinformatics 4 12-08-2015 01:48 AM
Problems transferring annotations with RATT JWolters Bioinformatics 2 02-25-2015 09:16 PM
Huge NGS data storage and transferring himwo Bioinformatics 2 03-24-2011 01:32 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-07-2020, 02:48 AM   #1
Danner
Junior Member
 
Location: Berlin, Germany

Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 1
Default Cycle Transferring Question (uneven ends instead of 2x150)

Hey All,
I have increased the length of index runs and decreased the length of the main reads. There is an interfance to say how long you want each read to go for. So in principle instead of 2x150 you could do one of the ends with 300 reads as there is enough reagents. However I assume the quality goes down.

I am using a miniSeq or HiSeq. I normally would use kits that are 2x150. However on one of my ends the primer had to be further away then I would like. Could I get Read1 to go 200 cycles and read2 to go 100 cycles? I know that I can program it in, but what problems may I encounter? Would the read quality fall and I end up with NNNN for the last 50 cycles? I know that this happens if you try and go 400 cycles on one end with MiSeq.

Thanks!
Danner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2020, 04:44 AM   #2
GenoMax
Senior Member
 
Location: East Coast USA

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,076
Default

You should be able to do asymmetric runs like that. But wait for @luc or one of the experimental people to confirm for certain.

As long as there is sequenceable material left there should be no NNN calls. Quality will suffer like you expect. My assumption is you got NNN calls in your prior run because you read through the adapter on other end and kept on going.
GenoMax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2020, 05:47 AM   #3
itstrieu
Member
 
Location: Atlanta

Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 27
Default

While not asymmetric, we did a 2x300 run on a 500 cycle kit by accident and read 1 looked good but read 2 quality dropped after 230 cycles due to reagents starting to run out.

I don't see any issue with asymmetric runs other than Q30 scores dropping the longer the read length. Especially if it is >300 cycle on the PE side.
itstrieu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2020, 05:59 AM   #4
HESmith
Senior Member
 
Location: Bethesda MD

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 509
Default

Yes, you can perform asymmetric runs - it's routine for single-cell RNA-Seq. Quality will decline with read length, and (in our experience) drops to unacceptable levels when you exceed the recommended maximum (e.g., 150bp on HiSeq 4000). Better to design a custom primer that's closer to region you wish to sequence (assuming that's an option).
HESmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
illumina cycles, pair end sequencing

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO