Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • interpreting cuffdiff output with and without replicates

    Hi SEQers

    I am calling on your expertise!

    I have an RNA Seq data set which is a growth time series.

    I have used Tophat->Cufflinks->Cuffdiff on these data.

    To look at differential gene expression between 6 time points I have use the cuffdiff output file the gene_exp.diff file.

    I have run cuffdiff three different ways
    1. with the -T (time series) option
    2. with out the -T option
    3. just using two time points - comparing the first time point to each successive time point.

    Each of these runs produces different numbers of significantly different genes between any two time points. As one might expect, the overall the numbers of genes with significant differential expression is much lower in case 1 and 2 compared to case 3.

    I would like to understand the reason for this.

    Looking at the gene_exp.diff file output from cuffdiff particularly column 10 the "test stat" this number is different if looking at a .diff file that came from a comparison of two files (case 3) vs one which came from all 6 time points (cases 1 and 2).

    Reading the cufflink manuel and associate information on line it looks like "test stat" is calculated based on a variance of the fpkm's of each replicate.

    I am assuming that these differences are because when I use these 6 files (.bams) in cuffdiff with or with out the -T option (case 1 or 2 ) cuffdiff uses these 6 files as though they are replicates. In case 3 where I have only use two bam files for cuffdiff
    for some genes there are two replicates and others there are no replicates.

    My question is how would you interpret the data from case 3? Should I disregard case 3 and only consider data from cases 1 and 2?

    Thanks for your insights,

    Cynthia


    from http://cufflinks.cbcb.umd.edu/howitworks#hdif

    "Note that in order to calculate the test statistic T, we need to know the variance of the expression level in each condition. The variance needs to include the variability in the number of fragments generated by the transcript across replicates, and should also incorporate any uncertainty in the expression estimate itself."

  • #2
    Whoops where I said .bam I meant .sam!

    Comment


    • #3
      Actually I think this assumption of mine in not correct:

      I am assuming that these differences are because when I use these 6 files (.sam) in cuffdiff with or with out the -T option (case 1 or 2 ) cuffdiff uses these 6 files as though they are replicates. In case 3 where I have only use two bam files for cuffdiff
      for some genes there are two replicates and others there are no replicates.

      These are not considered replicates - so why am I getting different "test stat" numbers in the gene_exp.diff files?

      Comment


      • #4
        I use Tophat outfiles (.sam) in cuffdiff always without the -T option.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • seqadmin
          Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
          by seqadmin




          The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...
          04-22-2024, 07:01 AM
        • seqadmin
          Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
          by seqadmin


          Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
          04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 08:47 AM
        0 responses
        13 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
        0 responses
        60 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
        0 responses
        60 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seqadmin  
        Working...
        X