SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > Sample Prep / Library Generation



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Agilent Bioanalyzer alternatives? rmetz Sample Prep / Library Generation 20 06-18-2015 12:14 AM
Covaris MicroTubes - Reusable? thesmurph General 12 07-13-2014 12:59 AM
Alternatives to Roche Shotgun and PE protocol Raj 454 Pyrosequencing 1 04-08-2011 04:09 AM
REM e for more than two-lane plates flxlex 454 Pyrosequencing 2 01-04-2011 10:16 PM
Alternatives to sfffile & sffinfo Xterra 454 Pyrosequencing 5 06-28-2010 07:09 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-11-2012, 06:31 AM   #1
gajz
Junior Member
 
Location: Gainesville, Fl

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2
Default Covaris microTubes or 96 well plates - alternatives?

Hello,

I am using Covaris sonication method to fragment genomic DNA. The only issue I have so far is that the microTubes are quite expensive ($5 each), as well as the 96 well plates ($ 450 each).

Does anyone have tried different glass tubes or plates that are more cost effective? I am not planning on reuse them, just want a cheap alternative.

Thanks a lot,
gajz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 06:41 AM   #2
Heisman
Senior Member
 
Location: St. Louis

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 535
Default

We use PCR plates regularly. The sonication is not quite as good (ie, harder to get 150-200bp and a tight distribution, and we sonicate overnight, but it's obviously much cheaper. I would try a plate (we've tried one type and it works for us... I bet others would work too) with commercial genomic DNA and see what happens.
Heisman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2012, 05:44 PM   #3
gajz
Junior Member
 
Location: Gainesville, Fl

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2
Default

Thanks for your answer Heisman,

I will try with a 96 plate to see what happens, but do you think that the fact the wells are made of plastic can affect the results? How important is doing the sonication on a glass surface?
gajz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2012, 05:46 PM   #4
Heisman
Senior Member
 
Location: St. Louis

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 535
Default

As I said, it's harder to get down to the proper base size, likely due to that reason. I would try some sessions sonicating for 10 minutes with 10/5/500, 10/5/200, 20/5/500, and 20/5/200 settings and see how that performs, then go from there.
Heisman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2012, 10:07 AM   #5
Hamid
Senior Member
 
Location: San Diego, CA

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 105
Default

Dear Gajz,

I apologize for the delay in responding to your post.
While seemingly beneficial to use a low cost PCR tube in your Covaris instrument, it is critical to address the energy requirement to generate small DNA fragments. Covaris specifically engineered the microTUBE to work in conjunction with AFA to control the energy for generation of small DNA fragments:

1. The amount of energy required to shear DNA is inversely proportional to the size of the DNA fragments desired. For example, large fragments such as 3kb require low energy and consequently, plastic may be used (e.g., Covaris miniTUBE). More importantly, however, is that to generate small fragments of DNA, a high level of energy is required. If this energy is not efficiently transferred to the sample and if the subsequent heat is not readily dissipated the sample will quickly heat. As a result, for shearing to NGS-size fragments it is essential to maintain an isothermal processing temperature during shearing by controlling the thermal events through BOTH hardware (Covaris AFA) and the consumable (microTUBE). These tubes are specifically designed to work with the acoustic circuitry to maintain an isothermal environment during DNA shearing

2. Plastic materials such as polypropylene PCR tubes absorb acoustic energy and then through convective heat-transfer your sample is heated. Your sample may be in an iced water bath, but your internal sample fluid is heated. The heat is then prevented from efficiently dissipating from the sample since the polypropylene then acts as an insulator. I have attached a slide of the temperature mapping of DNA samples sheared to 200pb in the Covaris microTUBEs compared to the same sample processed in a think wall 200ul PCR tube. As you can see, even though the PCR tube sample is in a 6C water bath, the temperature of the sample is greater than 50C. In comparison the temperature of the sample in the microTUBE using the same settings is the same at that of the surrounding water bath.

3. The lack of the thermal control when using the PCR tubes/plates will certainly effect reproducibility, shearing size distribution, total DNA recovery, and will cause thermal biased shearing of samples in regions with low GC content.

4. Several large sequencing centers did initially evaluate using PCR plates instead of the microTUBE plate, but observed shearing inconsistency, and failed sequencing runs which they attributed to the shearing in the PCR plates.

The microTUBE is an integral component of the AFA circuit.

Thank you

Hamid
Attached Files
File Type: pdf microTUBE vs PCR tube with AFA.pdf (175.9 KB, 68 views)

Last edited by Hamid; 04-18-2012 at 10:24 AM.
Hamid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2018, 07:30 AM   #6
tinkma
Junior Member
 
Location: boston

Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1
Default

Hi Gajz,

Did you ever test shear using PCR plates? How did it turn out and may I ask what offest did you use? Thank you.
tinkma is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO