Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SNP density

    Hi guys,

    This is my first thread here in this forum. I hope I'm writing this question into the correct category!

    Well, I have called variants with samtools mpileup, where:

    MAPQ=20 # min map quality
    BASEQ=20 # min base quality

    and then filtered them by:

    MINCOV=5 # min coverage
    MAXCOV=30 # maximum coverage

    Now, I have to look for the SNP density within the region sequenced. For that, I obtain the depth file (samtools depth).

    awk '{nucleotides++} END {print nucleotides}' depthfile.txt
    #In order to know the real length.

    It should be as simple as divide the number of SNP by the length. However, doing that I would obtain a wrong number of SNP/kb, because I've filtered SNPs by quality and coverage.

    So, am I correct if I should filter the depth file by coverage? Quality as well? Or not?

    Thanks a lot, guys.

  • #2
    You do not need to deal with the depth file. All you need is the VCF file (produced by mpileup and bcftools, but other variant calling pipelines also produces this output type). This contains the depth information and quality. You should filter SNPs by quality and depth.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • seqadmin
      Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
      by seqadmin




      The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...
      04-22-2024, 07:01 AM
    • seqadmin
      Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
      by seqadmin


      Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
      04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by seqadmin, Today, 11:49 AM
    0 responses
    12 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 08:47 AM
    0 responses
    16 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
    0 responses
    61 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
    0 responses
    60 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Working...
    X