Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Conceptual question of validity of transcriptional profiling

    I have a question regarding data handling of RNA-seq experiments and even microarray I guess.

    How do these methods take total total cellular expression into account?

    For instance say I was looking at the global analysis of the transcriptome of whole arabidopsis early seed vs. mature seed. One would expect the overall expression of the late dormant seed to be low.

    Let's pretend there are only 5 genes in my seed, A, B, C, D, and E. Here are the absolute expression values.

    Early:
    A: 10 transcripts/cell
    B: 10 transcripts/cell
    C: 20 transcripts/cell
    D: 40 transcripts/cell
    E: 20 transcripts/cell

    Late:
    A: 1 transcript/cell
    B: 1 transcript/cell
    C: 2 transcript/cell
    D: 4 transcript/cell
    E: 2 transcript/cell

    Although Late has lower absolute expression values, if I took 5 micrograms of total RNA from both to prepare a library, each sample would have 10% transcript A, 10% transcript B, 20% transcript C, 40% transcript D, and 20% transcript E - it would just take more late seeds to produce that much RNA.

    If differential expression was performed on each of these with no manipulation to the data, it would appear as if the levels of expression of these genes within each tissue are the same right?

    How is this corrected for in analyses? Is a housekeeping gene generally used to normalize expression patterns, and are housekeeping genes even useful when looking at cells with dormant expression and limited proliferation?

    Let's take a look at one more scenario. Instead lets say I am comparing early seed to maturing seed, in which a family of transcripts coding for storage proteins are highly highly expressed.

    Early:
    A: 10 transcripts/cell
    B: 10 transcripts/cell
    C: 20 transcripts/cell
    D (storage protein): 40 transcripts/cell
    E (storage protein): 20 transcripts/cell

    Late:
    A: 10 transcripts/cell
    B: 10 transcripts/cell
    C: 20 transcripts/cell
    D (storage protein): 400 transcripts/cell
    E (storage protein): 200 transcripts/cell

    In this example, if I were to take both libraries and perform sequencing, A, B, and C would appear to be downregulated in late seed, even though their relative expression is the same.

    So basically my question is, are we actually just measuring the relative proportions of transcripts in transcriptional profiling experiments, or is there some sort of correction method that allows us to speculate actual absolute values? Sorry for the long post. Wanted to be clear.

  • #2
    In cases where you suspect global transcriptional amplification/repression to play a role you need to use spike-ins. This is also true for single-cell sequencing, essentially for the reasons you outlined. Normally this isn't the case and you can simply use the fact that most genes aren't changed for normalization.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • seqadmin
      Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
      by seqadmin




      The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...
      04-22-2024, 07:01 AM
    • seqadmin
      Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
      by seqadmin


      Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
      04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by seqadmin, Today, 08:47 AM
    0 responses
    11 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
    0 responses
    60 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
    0 responses
    59 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
    0 responses
    54 views
    0 likes
    Last Post seqadmin  
    Working...
    X