Go Back   SEQanswers > Introductions
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
16S metagenomics on MiSeq sajoshi Illumina/Solexa 3 04-05-2016 08:43 AM
Time & Cost of using 1 MiSeq Machine to do 16s rDNA (V2/V4) Seq on 300 Samples/Month vs92 Illumina/Solexa 28 10-09-2015 11:07 AM
MiSeq 16S - a couple of questions cliffbeall Illumina/Solexa 4 11-04-2014 02:41 AM
Serial Illumina Sequencing (SI-seq) protocol for 16S - will it work on the MiSeq? stan1991 Illumina/Solexa 5 02-07-2013 01:11 AM
Who uses a MiSeq for 16S data? capsicum Metagenomics 0 11-21-2012 01:10 PM

Thread Tools
Old 07-11-2021, 04:13 AM   #1
Junior Member
Location: Switzerland

Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 1
Question New to 16S Seq on MiSeq

Hello Everyone!

I'm Zimtblatt and I am happy to have found this community.

I'm from a biology background and have been analyzing 16S data (obtained from a sequencing company) for a previous project with QIIME.

Now I am working in a lab that is using a MiSeq for other purposes and the idea is that I establish the 16S RNA sequencing on the MiSeq for analysis of human fecal samples there.

By now I have prepared a library (V4 primers, library prep according to the Illumina 16S protocol, 5% PhiX spike-in) and did a first run on the MiSeq (v2nano, 2 x 250).
The run looks much worse than the data we obtained for the previous project from the sequencing company (which is probably exceptionaly clean), but I am not sure whether the data quality is so bad, that it is a problem (QC>30 is 76.8%, for more information please see attachments) that should be tackled at the library prep/sequencing step or whether I can cope with the data by filtering.
I can only say, that the quality control step in QIIME2 (with dada2) takes much longer, in fact so long, that my laptop is unable to cope and I get an error message.

If the data quality is not good enough, the next questions are, how to improve sequencing and library prep. The run does not look overclustered (875 K/mm2). Should I consider increasing PhiX spike-in? (According to recent posts, a high PhiX spike-in does not seem to be necessary any more with up-to-date Illumina software).
Please let me know, if you need any further information.

I am fully aware that these are very basic questions and I would be happy about links to reliable resources, for learning these basics.

Thank you very much for your help!

kind regards,

Attached Images
File Type: png SAV run summary.png (34.6 KB, 0 views)
File Type: png SAV data by cycle.png (141.7 KB, 0 views)
File Type: png Q-Score distribution and heatmap.png (146.0 KB, 0 views)
Zimtblatt is offline   Reply With Quote

16s illumina analysis, phix, quality control

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO