![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
16S metagenomics on MiSeq | sajoshi | Illumina/Solexa | 3 | 04-05-2016 08:43 AM |
Time & Cost of using 1 MiSeq Machine to do 16s rDNA (V2/V4) Seq on 300 Samples/Month | vs92 | Illumina/Solexa | 28 | 10-09-2015 11:07 AM |
MiSeq 16S - a couple of questions | cliffbeall | Illumina/Solexa | 4 | 11-04-2014 02:41 AM |
Serial Illumina Sequencing (SI-seq) protocol for 16S - will it work on the MiSeq? | stan1991 | Illumina/Solexa | 5 | 02-07-2013 01:11 AM |
Who uses a MiSeq for 16S data? | capsicum | Metagenomics | 0 | 11-21-2012 01:10 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Switzerland Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 1
|
![]()
Hello Everyone!
I'm Zimtblatt and I am happy to have found this community. I'm from a biology background and have been analyzing 16S data (obtained from a sequencing company) for a previous project with QIIME. Now I am working in a lab that is using a MiSeq for other purposes and the idea is that I establish the 16S RNA sequencing on the MiSeq for analysis of human fecal samples there. By now I have prepared a library (V4 primers, library prep according to the Illumina 16S protocol, 5% PhiX spike-in) and did a first run on the MiSeq (v2nano, 2 x 250). The run looks much worse than the data we obtained for the previous project from the sequencing company (which is probably exceptionaly clean), but I am not sure whether the data quality is so bad, that it is a problem (QC>30 is 76.8%, for more information please see attachments) that should be tackled at the library prep/sequencing step or whether I can cope with the data by filtering. I can only say, that the quality control step in QIIME2 (with dada2) takes much longer, in fact so long, that my laptop is unable to cope and I get an error message. If the data quality is not good enough, the next questions are, how to improve sequencing and library prep. The run does not look overclustered (875 K/mm2). Should I consider increasing PhiX spike-in? (According to recent posts, a high PhiX spike-in does not seem to be necessary any more with up-to-date Illumina software). Please let me know, if you need any further information. I am fully aware that these are very basic questions and I would be happy about links to reliable resources, for learning these basics. Thank you very much for your help! kind regards, Zimtblatt |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
16s illumina analysis, phix, quality control |
Thread Tools | |
|
|