SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > General



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New to Next Gen abhagwat Introductions 8 02-09-2012 09:54 AM
GeneProf - Next-Gen Analysis for Next-Gen Data florian Bioinformatics 0 01-30-2012 03:21 AM
First gen forum? pmiguel Site Feedback/Suggestions 6 06-28-2011 11:25 AM
Transitioning from Previous-Gen to Next-Gen conrad_halling Introductions 0 05-23-2010 07:58 AM
New to Next-Gen adoust Introductions 0 05-10-2010 02:40 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-13-2010, 12:12 PM   #21
ECO
--Site Admin--
 
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,355
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joann View Post
OK, so how about LBP (little bitty pieces) sequencing?
Not all technologies are short read.
ECO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2010, 12:12 PM   #22
GW_OK
Senior Member
 
Location: Oklahoma

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 404
Default

"All samples will undergo Markedly Faster and Slightly Longer Than Last Year sequencing to identify rare variants".
GW_OK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2010, 01:30 PM   #23
jrt@thompsonclan.org
Junior Member
 
Location: NJ

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2
Default Which generation?

By my count Sanger is 3rd generation. The 1st nucleic acid sequence I remember was a tRNA sequence obtained by analysis of nuclease products on 2D thin layer chromatography. Then Maxam-Gilbert chemical sequencing emerged as the 1st tractable way to sequence longer stretches of DNA (how many or you know how to pour a meter long, 0.5mm thick polyacrylamide gel with no bubbles?). Then came the Sanger method which was much less finicky than chemical sequencing and ruled for more or less a human generation (albeit with technical improvements like switching to capillary electrophoresis along the way).

Now what you have is the parallel evolution of a variety of different technologies. I think the generational analogy has broken down. Perhaps a speciation analogy is more applicable now. I don't see single molecule sequencing as the next wave per se, rather each technology competing now has a niche application and often two technologies need to be combined to do a particular job well.
jrt@thompsonclan.org is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2010, 02:20 PM   #24
GW_OK
Senior Member
 
Location: Oklahoma

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 404
Default

How about Age of Aquarius Sequencing? We could all grow our hair out, it'd be groovy.
GW_OK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 06:33 AM   #25
Joann
Senior Member
 
Location: Woodbridge CT

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 231
Default Oh, the gels I have poured....

I did not have any bubble problems with acrylamide gels--would simply degas a solution of 5x recrystalized acrylamide before pouring....

Additionally, I've made purified whole protein samples, but never got to perform sequencing on those. Protein sequencing provided us the first glimpse at evolutionary conservation and those isoforms in action. Now we have the short course.
Joann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2010, 11:34 AM   #26
kedes
Junior Member
 
Location: Los Angeles

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1
Default It will be "XGen": Before X PRIZE, After X PRIZE

How to identify sequencing technologies will become straightforward after some team demonstrates they can win the $10M Archon Genomic X PRIZE <http://genomics.xprize.org/>. The stringent requirements of the AGXP will distinguish all platforms capable of achieving such goals and henceforth sequencing platforms would be identified as “X PRIZE Capable” versus those that are not.

Larry Kedes
Senior Advisor. X PRIZE Foundation
Scientific Director, Archon Genomic X PRIZE
kedes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2010, 12:05 PM   #27
janejane
Member
 
Location: Midwest

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 15
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael.James.Clark View Post

ECO, I actually think you might be okay leaving "next generation" in the tag line. I mean, we are always going to be discussing the "next generation" (plus some of the last generation, probably).
I like the idea of always having the "next gen" name.
janejane is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO