Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 3' Adapter Trimming

    Hi everyone,

    I am using Maq for alignments and have found the 3' adapter trimming to be very informative about my overall run/sample prep quality. However, I am not clear about how this actually is working and have a couple questions...

    For instance, I have in one lane 13,145,392 quality filtered reads. Using the adapter trimming option I get 10,270,661 possible reads with adapter contamination, and a total of 2,949,120 paired reads mapping (3,404,692 total mapped). So this mapping number is greater than the number of reads NOT containing adapters 13,145,392-10,270,661 = 2,874,731.

    So, does Maq simply trim off any adapter and continue with alignment if the read is of sufficient length? Am I reading this correctly?

    Next, I have aligned the same exact reads to 3 different regions and for each I get 3 different counts for possible adapter contamination with everything else being equal. For the lane I mentioned above, I get a) 10,270,661 b) 10,473,317 and c) 10,299,171 counts for adapters but again these are the exact same reads, just a different region for alignment -- not huge differences, but differences nonetheless

    I whipped together a super simple perl script to count 3' adapters in my FASTQs and get nowhere near the same number..

    Code:
    $adapt = GATCGGAA;
    $count = 0;
    
    while (<>) {
      $line = $_;
      chomp $line;
      if ($line =~ m/^$adapt/) {
        $count++;
      }
    }
    print "\nThere are $count sequences with adapter!\n\n";
    Again, super simple, but with this for the aforementioned lane I get 6,615,038 reads containing adapter....

    Does anybody have some insight to any of these issues? Thanks everyone!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
    by seqadmin


    Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
    04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
  • seqadmin
    Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
    by seqadmin


    Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
    03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
0 responses
18 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
0 responses
22 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
0 responses
16 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
0 responses
47 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X