Go Back   SEQanswers > General

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Contamination in my sample? arkal Bioinformatics 6 10-21-2013 09:43 PM
how to detect contamination or sample preparation artifacts in sequencing results roll Bioinformatics 2 10-17-2013 03:13 AM
Sample Cross-Contamination MAdkisson General 1 07-31-2012 09:25 AM
How to filter a possible DNA contamination in fastq sample reads Jluis Bioinformatics 2 07-10-2012 03:14 AM
Bacterial contamination in salival sample ulz_peter Sample Prep / Library Generation 2 02-20-2012 11:57 AM

Thread Tools
Old 01-11-2019, 08:10 AM   #1
Junior Member
Location: West Lafayette, IN

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 4
Default sample contamination?

I seem to have some contamination in my demultiplexed sequences, but I'm not sure what to make it: is it phix contamination? library prep contamination? something else? details:

gDNA from 96 eukaryotic individuals were ddRADseq prepped per Parchman et al. 2012, sequenced on one late of illumina nextseq500 with 83bp PE reads. Raw files were demultiplexed with process_radtags in STACKS:

process_radtags -P -p ./raw_reads_fastq_format/ -b ND_barcodes5.txt -o ./demultiplexed_jan_2019/ -r -i fastq -y gzfastq --inline_null --renz_1 ecoRI --renz_2 mseI -s 10 -w 0.15 --disable_rad_check -D

blasting resulting sequences hits mostly prokaryotic genomes, including phix. further, some of the files contain a low diversity of sequences. any insight would be appreciated!
sjkimble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2019, 11:30 AM   #2
Registered Vendor
Location: Eugene, OR

Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 464

What kind of organisms were you genotyping. Some samples we do, like small insects, can have significant bacterial contamination due to the microbiome of the organism. Other kinds of samples, like museum samples or field collected samples that weren't stored in a way to prevent bacterial growth, also have high bacterial loads.

If we are working on a project with a little known species, the blast will hit any contaminating bacteria but not the species of interest, but that just reflects the absence of a closely related genome to the host. So if you aren't getting many blast hits with a high proportion of the ones you do get being bacteria then it might be OK...the ones you want just aren't blasting. If you get a blast hit to every read and it is nearly all bacteria then you have a problem!

If you have the ability to throw a few samples onto the next run, you might try just doing WGS on a few samples (with or without contamination) and seeing how the DNA looks independent of the ddRAD prep. Maybe the cut site frequency is much higher in your bacterial genomes, for instance.
Providing nextRAD genotyping and PacBio sequencing services.
SNPsaurus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2019, 12:22 PM   #3
Junior Member
Location: West Lafayette, IN

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 4


Thanks for your reply. Yes, these were frog toes so perhaps we've sequenced the cutaneous microbiome! I will do more BLASTING to get a better proportion of the sequences are frog and yes, there are very few amphibians out there in sequenceland.

sjkimble is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO