![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
BWA alignment of multiple read files, the order of processing matters? | gene_x | Bioinformatics | 8 | 07-12-2013 01:20 PM |
Bowtie2 Bug: error reporting multiple alignments | all_your_base | Bioinformatics | 0 | 10-31-2012 12:17 PM |
Tools for estimation of indels and refinement for multiple sequence alignments | rdlady | Bioinformatics | 0 | 09-07-2012 08:06 AM |
multiple alignments with BWA | efoss | Bioinformatics | 0 | 08-07-2011 12:37 PM |
How many multiple alignments to allow? | hlwright | Bioinformatics | 0 | 04-14-2011 12:40 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: Birmingham, Al Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 39
|
![]()
Bowtie clearly indicates in its manual that it will randomly assign any read for which there are multiple equally valid alignments. I can not see any such discussion regarding the "mem" aligner for BWA. Can anyone tell me how BWA handles multiple alignments per read, and what the default settings are?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: Boston Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 693
|
![]()
Only outputs the best hit or a random one if there are multiple. You can ask to report more with -a. Note that bwa-mem may report chimeric alignments, but those are different from multiple mappings you are talking about.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Location: Russia, Irkutsk Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 40
|
![]()
Can anyone please explain me why the default behaviour is to randomly choose one of mappings? Making sense of multiple mappings is big enough headache without mapper hiding half the results from you.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Senior Member
Location: San Diego Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 912
|
![]() Quote:
If a region is repeated 100 times, it will have 100x coverage as compared to the rest of the genome, which would really screw with trying to count how well the rest of the genome is covered. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|