Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • multiple FPKM problem for single gene in gene_exp.diff after running cuffdiff

    I ran tophat (1.1.0) without a mouse gtf file. Run cufflinks (0.9.1) without a mouse gtf file. Then run cuffcompare with a mouse gtf file and two gtf files generated from cufflinks for my two samples. Finally, I ran cuffdiff with compare.combined.gtf and two accepted_hits.bam files.

    However, I checked one of the cuffdiff output files: gene_exp.diff. I found there is still multiple FPKM problem for many genes (see below):

    XLOC_000009 Cspp1 chr1:10053629-10189988 q1 q2 OK 44.5012 58.359 0.271096 -2.93789 0.00330457 yes
    XLOC_000010 Arfgef1 chr1:10053629-10189988 q1 q2 OK 10.0582 7.68137 -0.269589 4.88261 1.04688e-06 yes
    XLOC_000011 Arfgef1 chr1:10053629-10189988 q1 q2 OK 40.66 31.8566 -0.244 17.6406 0 yes
    XLOC_000013 Arfgef1 chr1:10053629-10189988 q1 q2 OK 2.7768 40.8059 2.68753 -144.972 0 yes
    XLOC_000015 Arfgef1 chr1:10053629-10189988 q1 q2 OK 54.0345 65.0081 0.18489 -12.9339 0 yes
    XLOC_000016 Arfgef1 chr1:10053629-10189988 q1 q2 OK 23.4654 43.6672 0.62107 -29.4492 0 yes
    XLOC_000031 Tram2 chr1:20986216-20997026 q1 q2 OK 5.8219 2.96147 -0.67594 3.70609 0.000210487 yes
    XLOC_000032 Tram2 chr1:20986216-20997026 q1 q2 OK 3.33419 14.9065 1.49757 -29.7646 0 yes
    XLOC_000057 Tmem131 chr1:36849038-36996484 q1 q2 OK 37.3723 30.8444 -0.191975 5.03247 4.84195e-07 yes

    Did I do something wrong? Wht do some genes only have one FPKM (one row) and some genes have multple FPKM (multple rows)?

    I have another question regarding gene_exp.diff file. The first gene Cspp1 has the same coordiates (chr1:10053629-10189988) as the second gene Arfgef1. But in my mouse gtf file (from Ensembl), the coordinates for those two genes are:
    Cspp1: Chromosome 1: 10,028,299-10,126,849
    Arfgef1: Chromosome 1: 10,127,652-10,222,751

    Those two genes are not overlapped. Why do they have the same coordinates in gene_exp.diff file?

    Thank you very much!

  • #2
    I have the same issue of multiple lines per gene

    I have this issue as well -
    can anyone explain why there are multiple lines per gene?
    is it valid or indicate a problem?
    how can I reduce it to have 1 line per gene?

    hope now someone will answer,
    thanks

    Comment


    • #3
      Bump - I have been wondering this same thing myself.

      I thought the gene_exp.diff was supposed to sum or average the FPKMs for each gene to give an overall expression level.

      Comment


      • #4
        Cuffcompare IS reporting one line per gene, but the "genes" it cares about are the XLOC models, not the ones named in column 2. The gene names from your GTF file(s) (column 2) merely report the closest annotated gene model to the models developed by cufflinks/cuffcompare.

        I ran tophat (1.1.0) without a mouse gtf file. Run cufflinks (0.9.1) without a mouse gtf file. Then run cuffcompare with a mouse gtf file and two gtf files generated from cufflinks for my two samples. Finally, I ran cuffdiff with compare.combined.gtf and two accepted_hits.bam files.
        To get results which solely report previously annotated genes you should run TopHat with the "-G mm9.gtf --no-novel-junctions" and then run Cufflinks with "-G mm9.gtf"
        Last edited by kmcarr; 03-30-2011, 05:36 AM.

        Comment


        • #5
          A similar thing happened with my gene.exp.diff file where the first few genes have the correct ID's matching those in the gtf file and have different FPKM's, but the coordinates are the same (they all match that of the very first gene from .gtf).

          This seems more like a glitch to me since it seems to only occur for the first few lines of the exp.diff file. Is this the same for everyone else? or did you find this phenomenon at random throughout your exp.diff file? Also, if cuffdiff were really having a problem where it considered several genes to have identical coordinates then wouldn't the FPKMs be the same as well?

          I hope that makes some sense, and thanks everyone for the comments.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • seqadmin
            Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
            by seqadmin


            Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
            04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
          • seqadmin
            Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
            by seqadmin


            Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
            03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
          0 responses
          24 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
          0 responses
          25 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
          0 responses
          21 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
          0 responses
          52 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Working...
          X