Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > Sample Prep / Library Generation

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Contamination with bacterial rRNA JakobHedegaard Sample Prep / Library Generation 1 12-13-2011 07:48 AM
mRNA from Bacterial sample for trueseq Garyron Sample Prep / Library Generation 9 08-16-2011 12:42 AM
How to evaluate reads quality of a sample for a bacterial genome nivea Bioinformatics 0 07-11-2011 12:12 PM
Bacterial genomic DNA sample mazinga Sample Prep / Library Generation 9 01-31-2011 09:47 AM
Identification of Genomic Repeats and Sample Contamination in Assemblies of 454 Pyros flxlex Literature Watch 0 01-14-2010 01:31 AM

Thread Tools
Old 02-02-2012, 02:38 AM   #1
Senior Member
Location: Graz, Austria

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 219
Default Bacterial contamination in salival sample

Hi Guys,

Now to something completely different... We would like to sequence DNA obtained from saliva. Now the thing is saliva contains a lot of bacteria (according to Wikipedia: 500 million cells / ml). When we isolate DNA their DNA should still be there, right? So, if we'd make a shotgun library we would lose quite a lot of reads to bacterial DNA being sequenced.

Is there a way to get rid of that or is that already done during DNA isolation (we're using Oragene Kit)?

Any help is highly appreciated,

ulz_peter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2012, 10:02 AM   #2
Senior Member
Location: Ohio

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 144

This made me chuckle because our group is interested in the bacterial sequences from saliva. You wouldn't want to send us the bacterial sequences you're not going to use, would you?

Seriously, the only thing I can think of is to do the lysis step without a lot of agitation. A lot of bacteria are fairly tough. We use Qiagen and add bead-beating to completely recover the bacterial DNA.
cliffbeall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2012, 10:57 AM   #3
--Site Admin--
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,358

I have seen a couple methods out there for differential lysis of human vs bacterial cells (one was from a company called ZyGEM but i couldn't find it just now, it was a couple years ago).

My experience is that with the Oragene kit's fairly strong lysis/preservation buffer you'll get a ton of bacterial DNA as well. As cliffbeall said, you may not get perfect representation of the bacteria due to differental resistance to lysis.

Buccal swabs are cleaner, as you're scraping human tissue intentionally, but you won't get as much yield/sample.
ECO is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO