SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > Illumina/Solexa



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The NEXTflex™ PCR-Free DNA Sequencing Kit Reduces Bias in NGS Library Prep Bioo Scientific Vendor Forum 10 12-20-2012 07:10 AM
RNASeq removing PCR bias schaffer Bioinformatics 3 10-20-2011 06:00 PM
DNA amount for making Lib-L from PCR fragment knakahig 454 Pyrosequencing 0 02-24-2011 04:24 AM
PCR bias by backfolding amplicons Sebastian123 Sample Prep / Library Generation 3 02-09-2011 03:10 AM
Number of PCR How many PCR cycles to enrich adapter-modified DNA fragments MGH Man Sample Prep / Library Generation 5 07-26-2010 05:15 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-15-2013, 10:23 AM   #1
prepagam
Junior Member
 
Location: N.California

Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 7
Default Lib prep - Splitting PCR to reduce PCR bias

I want to reduce my high levels of duplicate reads (>50%) in my illumina HiSeq 100bp Paired end sequences.
The normal solutions aren't possible as I am using the max DNA available per sample (80-200ng), and only with 10-12 PCR cycles, my library is strong enough to sequence.

I wondered if I could reduce PCR bias by splitting the PCR into two tubes, and then pool after PCR? This idea is based on the assumption that the bias generated by PCR is random, and therefore different PCRs will over/under represent different parts of the genome.

A similar approach is used in some protocols for RADseq - but their library prep does differ.
prepagam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2013, 11:24 AM   #2
kcchan
Senior Member
 
Location: USA

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 184
Default

How much library are you getting with 10 cycles of PCR? 100ng of DNA should get you plenty of library for sequencing. You should double check your upstream steps to ensure everything is working efficiently, especially the adapter ligation.

If you're running the cBot instruments internally, there are also tricks to load your samples starting with less than 1nM of DNA library.

Another question is how you're determining the duplication rate? Some programs such as fastqc do not accurately determine the duplication rate.
kcchan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2013, 03:30 PM   #3
kmcarr
Senior Member
 
Location: USA, Midwest

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,177
Default

What is your source DNA material?
kmcarr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
duplicate reads, library preparation, pcr bias

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO