![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SNP function prediction in non-human species | spark | Bioinformatics | 7 | 01-22-2013 02:45 AM |
Anyone knows know to access the Human Epigenome Project database.. | mandova | General | 0 | 12-20-2011 06:49 AM |
ChIP-Seq: hmChIP: a database and web server for exploring publicly available human an | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 1 | 12-04-2011 03:33 AM |
what next after recalibration? | adrian | Bioinformatics | 0 | 12-14-2010 06:08 PM |
SNP Database with Solexa/Illumina Reads | foolishbrat | Illumina/Solexa | 0 | 10-05-2009 02:54 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: US Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3
|
![]()
Hi all,
I am dealing with the genome data of one bird, there are only a few studies about this bird (thus I do not have good SNP data to do the recalibration). I wonder how can I do the recalibration. I found a suggestion from GATK website: http://www.broadinstitute.org/gsa/wik... They said we can bootstrap a database of known SNPs. However, I still have some questions. 1. When I do the initial round of SNP calling on my unrecalibrated data, Should I use any conditions or not? My colleagues are genotyping other genomes. When they do the recalibration (also without good SNP database), they are only requiring that genotypes containing an SNV had a genotype quality score ≥10. If I need to do the same thing as they did, what threshold should I use? They have high coverage genome (>20X), whereas my bird genome is low coverage (15X, after running DepthOfCoverage). 2. They also said "These steps could be repeated several times until convergence". Could anyone please provide some further information about this? Thanks, |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Location: US Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3
|
![]()
Any ideas?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Location: California Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 45
|
![]()
Things that people have been doing include:
taking the intersection of multiple snp callers using the hard filters using the top x percent By convergence, they mean use one of the above sets as truth, rerun the calibration on all of them, use one of the above methods agains, rerun the calibration and so on until your set of snps stops changing. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Location: US Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3
|
![]()
Thanks, it seems that I have to run it several times and try different thresholds.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
gatk, non-human, recalibration |
Thread Tools | |
|
|