![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Strange higher band in Bioanalyzer after size selection | JNissen | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 6 | 07-12-2013 12:10 PM |
Agilent Bioanalyzer refuses to size bands | pmiguel | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 13 | 03-09-2012 04:29 AM |
miRNA sequencing, sample size? | mrfox | Bioinformatics | 1 | 02-16-2012 07:34 AM |
Problems with Invitrogen Size Select E-gels for Illumina RNA-Seq Library Sample Prep? | Jerry Glenn | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 0 | 04-18-2011 08:14 AM |
ChIP seq - Different DNA size on agarosgel and Bioanalyzer | Leeenaaa | Introductions | 0 | 02-21-2011 01:23 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: walnut creek, CA Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 4
|
![]()
I am currently working on illumina sequencing sample preparation. For final PCR product, I check the same samples using invitrogen E-gel and bioanalyzer, but the DNA size from Bioanalyzer is always around 100bp larger than that on E-gel. I cut the 250bp band out of gel and qiagen column purified it, but I got a 350-400bp peak in Bioanalyzer. I am wondering if anybody here had the same experience and if this sample could still be sequenced. Thanks a lot.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Location: Maryland--we have a HiSeq too! Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 33
|
![]()
Try cleaning the bayonette cartridge in the bioanalyzer and rerunning first. We sometimes get shifts in samples and it's just because it needs a good cleaning. Soak it in molecular grade water overnight and then see what the run looks like.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Location: walnut creek, CA Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 4
|
![]()
thanks for the reply. Actually I run the E-gel DNA ladder and a regular PCR product (not an illumina sample) in the bioanalyzer. Both sizes are correct. I guess maybe my illumina samples contain some sort of complicated secondary structures. BTW, I forget to mention that the primers I used are not from illumina. I don't know if the illumina primers are modified so that they will give me the clean PCR product.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Location: CA Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1
|
![]()
Hi,
I am glad I am not the only one to get this. I also use none-illumina primer. At first, my libraries are fine and recently, the size shifted about 100bp up and I also suspect this is an artificial library. May I ask if what PCR reagent you are using? 2X phusion master mix or following the illumina protocol by adding enzyme, buffer, dNTP separately? thanks d for the discussion. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Location: walnut creek, CA Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 4
|
![]()
I used phusion polymerase and added those reagents separately. Additionally, I don't think it's phusion's issue since I tried pfu as well and got similar products. I guess we got complicated secondary structures in our PCR product (not just linear double stranded DNA) which cause either gel or bioanalyzer size shift.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|