![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Understanding Read Groups for single end and paired end data | imsharmanitin | Bioinformatics | 1 | 07-10-2018 04:05 AM |
Retrieving single and reads from paired end read sequencing run | Kaizen | Bioinformatics | 3 | 09-09-2016 07:38 PM |
Single end read with paired end reads | tahamasoodi | Bioinformatics | 2 | 01-16-2016 08:46 AM |
Mixing paired-end and single-end reads in Tophat: Do I have to reverse the SE-reads f | JonB | Bioinformatics | 5 | 12-11-2015 02:08 AM |
Confusion about single end vs paired end read output on Illumina HiSeq | acidcoated | Illumina/Solexa | 1 | 03-19-2015 09:56 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Saudi Arabia Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7
|
![]()
Hi all,
I want to use 300 cycle reagent kit from illumina with MiSeq So, My questions are: - Can I choose single read from Illumina Experiment Manager and read 300 bases from one direction instead of 150 from each side in Paired end read situation? -Is there any negative effect on reads if I did that? like the quality will be low at the last 50 or 100 bases of the read for example. -Doing that doesn't have any relation with using dual-indexing, am I right? I hope my questions are clear and I get a reply from anyone of you. Many Thanks Suha |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: East Coast USA Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,087
|
![]()
1. Yes (AFAIK).
2. Quality will be lower for the last set of cycles. Depending on your library quality (and nucloetide diversity) that effect may be more or less pronounced. 3. Index reads are separate from main reads. If you are asking if a 300 cycle kit could be run as 300 SE x 7 X 7, then yes. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Location: Saudi Arabia Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 7
|
![]()
Thanks very much for your useful reply
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|