SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > De novo discovery



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For ChIP-seq, maximal coverage at a peak? xxatbio Epigenetics 0 08-12-2013 12:06 AM
Plotting distribution of allelic frequency under different coverage values toots Bioinformatics 2 10-22-2012 10:57 AM
meta-velvetg cannot detect peak errors plumb Bioinformatics 1 04-05-2012 12:03 PM
Extracting base coverage and quality values from BAM files unagaswamy Bioinformatics 9 11-11-2010 06:55 AM
TopHat results-- negative coverage values seqseqseq Bioinformatics 0 01-21-2010 12:54 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-17-2013, 05:31 PM   #1
Andres_Gomez
Junior Member
 
Location: Urbana, IL

Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 8
Default Coverage peak values meta-velvetg

Hi

I have a metagenomic dataset composed by ~300 Million pair end reads (HiSeq) 150 bp read length and ~380 average fragment size.

I'm trying to run meta-velvet to assemble metagenomes. After choosing a kmer size of either 51 or 75 I see no difference between outputs from velvetg and meta-velvetg.

Furthermore, after running EstimateCovMulti.py, I end up with a -1 coverage peak value for both velvetg and meta-velvetg and the same very low N50 (~399). Strangely, that does not happen with all my samples.

Can anybody give me some clues as to what's going on here?

I'd really appreciate it

A
Andres_Gomez is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO