SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Literature Watch



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ChIP-Seq: ChIP-Seq Data Analysis: Identification of Protein-DNA Binding Sites with SI Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 12-02-2011 04:51 AM
ChIP-Seq: ChIP-Array: combinatory analysis of ChIP-seq/chip and microarray gene expre Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 05-19-2011 02:50 AM
ChIP-Seq: ChIP-chip versus ChIP-seq: Lessons for experimental design and data analysi Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 03-02-2011 02:50 AM
PubMed: BayesPeak: Bayesian analysis of ChIP-seq data. Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 09-24-2009 02:01 AM
PubMed: Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model with Application to Joint Analysis of ChIP-c Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 05-19-2009 05:00 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-15-2011, 02:10 AM   #1
Newsbot!
RSS Posting Maniac
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,443
Default ChIP-Seq: A fully Bayesian hidden Ising model for ChIP-seq data analysis.

Syndicated from PubMed RSS Feeds

A fully Bayesian hidden Ising model for ChIP-seq data analysis.

Biostatistics. 2011 Sep 13;

Authors: Mo Q

Abstract
Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by next generation sequencing (ChIP-seq) is a powerful technique that is being used in a wide range of biological studies including genome-wide measurements of protein-DNA interactions, DNA methylation, and histone modifications. The vast amount of data and biases introduced by sequencing and/or genome mapping pose new challenges and call for effective methods and fast computer programs for statistical analysis. To systematically model ChIP-seq data, we build a dynamic signal profile for each chromosome and then model the profile using a fully Bayesian hidden Ising model. The proposed model naturally takes into account spatial dependency and global and local distributions of sequence tags. It can be used for one-sample and two-sample analyses. Through model diagnosis, the proposed method can detect falsely enriched regions caused by sequencing and/or mapping errors, which is usually not offered by the existing hypothesis-testing-based methods. The proposed method is illustrated using 3 transcription factor (TF) ChIP-seq data sets and 2 mixed ChIP-seq data sets and compared with 4 popular and/or well-documented methods: MACS, CisGenome, BayesPeak, and SISSRs. The results indicate that the proposed method achieves equivalent or higher sensitivity and spatial resolution in detecting TF binding sites with false discovery rate at a much lower level.


PMID: 21914728 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]



More...
Newsbot! is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO