SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > Sample Prep / Library Generation



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
picogreen niceday General 0 11-04-2011 06:07 AM
tophat / bowtie mapping discrepancies vineeth_s Bioinformatics 3 06-10-2011 04:44 AM
qPCR - concentration vs cluster density for different libraries ScottC Sample Prep / Library Generation 0 03-17-2011 04:58 PM
qPCR quantification of mRNA seq libraries: strange amplicon sizes Martin_Ranik Illumina/Solexa 2 06-23-2009 04:31 AM
why consed finds discrepancies with masked n sequence alig Illumina/Solexa 3 06-12-2009 12:32 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-03-2008, 06:41 PM   #1
fedora
Junior Member
 
Location: UK

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4
Default Discrepancies between PicoGreen and qPCR in GA libraries

Hi all GA users.
Some ChIP libraries we make are giving a ~4x lower concentration by qPCR compared to PicoGreen. These same libraries when sequenced generate low cluster number (~4x less than other libraries) which isnt increased by using a higher library concentration. The reads we get are high quality and sample DNA-specific. <2% of reads contain the adapter sequence GATCGGAAGA the libraries do not seem to contain the ~120bp adapter multimer band I have seen others comment on. Has anyone observed this sort of thing before or have a potential explanation of the cause? Thanks!
fedora is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2008, 12:55 PM   #2
cjohns
Junior Member
 
Location: Seattle

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7
Default

I'm not sure if this is the answer or not, but for several preps we got huge peaks at 80bp that we believe to be primer dimers. When we put them on the GAII they did not produce any sequences. Maybe this is because they are too short to fold over and get amplified?
cjohns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2008, 10:16 PM   #3
fedora
Junior Member
 
Location: UK

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4
Default

Thanks cjohns. We dont see any 80bp or 120b products in these libraries (our DNA is 150-300bp) but maybe there is a causative connection there somewhere. I guess if there were sequences which are complementary to the oligos on the FC but which didnt for some reason contain both amplification primer sequences (or the sequencing primer target) they could mop up the FC oligos and yield nothing. Maybe we need to clone and sequence this stuff...
fedora is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2009, 05:52 AM   #4
Susanne
Member
 
Location: Germany

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 33
Default

This sounds a bit like it could be ssDNA filling up your FC, like you suggested. I've heard of similar things before, although I'm not sure where that amount of ssDNA comes from (preferred amplification of one strand??). That would at least explain the concentration difference you see with qPCR vs. PicoGreen.
However to get rid of ssDNA ?? - I thought the gel extraction should do the job, as ssDNA migrates slower than dsDNA.
Susanne is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO