Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PubMed: SNiPlay: a web-based tool for detection, management and analysis of SNPs. App Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 05-08-2011 03:42 AM
SNPs detection from NGS data slakov Bioinformatics 0 03-15-2011 05:34 AM
SNPs detection gfmgfm Bioinformatics 4 07-19-2010 06:27 AM
SNPs discovery with 454 pfranchini General 0 03-02-2010 12:43 AM
Number of runs required SNP detection transcriptome Tombre Illumina/Solexa 1 08-20-2009 11:13 AM

Thread Tools
Old 11-03-2010, 07:21 AM   #1
Giorgio C
Location: ITALY

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 89
Default 454 - Transcriptome SNPs Detection

Hy everybody,
I have assembled a Transcriptome with Newbler and than blasted all the isotig.fna. I would estimate the number of SNPs and their frequency but manually is impossible. Is there any automate tool to do this? Can anyone help me?
Thank you very much
Giorgio C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2010, 07:34 AM   #2
Rick Westerman
Location: Purdue University, Indiana, USA

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,104

I suggest that you use the Newbler 'mapper' instead of the assembler. This will automatically provide variants.
westerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2010, 07:46 AM   #3
Giorgio C
Location: ITALY

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 89

Thank you, but i need to map with "EST database" or with for exemple "Ensemble trasncriptome 37"? Where can i find the frequency in the output files or the statistic number of the work (total number of SNP..etc) ???
Giorgio C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2013, 01:21 AM   #4
Junior Member
Location: India

Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3

Hi all!

I am trying to assemble a low coverage 454 data of a plant using Newbler. I have two raw sff files from two different genotypes of my experimental plant. newbler completes the assembly step without a considerable error for the individual sffs. But when I try to assemble the sff files of both genotypes together(using incremental denovo assembly) it just adds up the total contigs and the singletons for that matter neglecting the possible common contigs between the two genotypes. To my understanding newbler is treating every read in both the sff files as unique which is very unlikely to happen. My basic aim is to find the SNPs and repeats in the genome and if newbler is assembling every read into a unique contig then this could be a matter of concern to me. Please provide the necessary explaination for this behaviour.
Kaurh5 is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO