Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Between species differential expression analysis

    Hi everybody,

    I have performed de novo assemblies of two non-model species using Trinity and I’ve used the Trinotate pipeline to get the annotation report of both of them. Now, I want to perform a differential expression analysis between the two species (same tissue), but I have somo problems:

    1-I have two Trinity.fasta files with my sequences as named by Trinity (e.g: >c0_g1_i1 len=1748 path=[45:0-1747]) and two Trinotate reports in .xls format. Does anybody know how to get a .fasta file with the sequence names obtained by Trinotate? If I don’t change the names, the sequence corresponding to any name (e.g: >c0_g1_i1 len=1748 path=[45:0-1747]), will not be the same in the two fasta files, and thus I will not be able to perform a DE analysis (as they don’t use the sequence itself but the sequence’s name).

    2-Does anybody knows a tool for between species DE analysis? I’ve been looking at the Trinity pipeline and seem good, but to use it I need to solve the first problem. I don’t know if more specific tools exist.

    Any help will be great.

    Thanks,

    Guillermo.
    Last edited by GillermoPonz; 08-20-2015, 04:08 AM. Reason: correcting format

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
    by seqadmin




    The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist...
    04-22-2024, 07:01 AM
  • seqadmin
    Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
    by seqadmin


    Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
    04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, Yesterday, 11:49 AM
0 responses
15 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-24-2024, 08:47 AM
0 responses
16 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
0 responses
61 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
0 responses
60 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X