![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Library quantification: opinions? | krobison | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 41 | 06-23-2016 07:38 PM |
Library quantification | suludana | Illumina/Solexa | 22 | 10-24-2013 04:52 PM |
Illumina library quantification | deepakpatilp | Illumina/Solexa | 75 | 06-24-2013 10:21 AM |
RNA-seq from oligo(dT) primed cDNA | ETHANol | RNA Sequencing | 1 | 11-23-2011 11:37 AM |
Library Quantification Confusion! | peromhc | Sample Prep / Library Generation | 9 | 10-05-2011 08:18 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Germany Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1
|
![]()
I am quite new in the field of next generation sequencing and I hope to get some information and help here.
I want to do a RNA-Seq by using the Illumina platform to analyze the transcript profile of a specific tissue of a wildtype plant compared to a mutant. The aim is identifying a different transcription level of some genes as well as finding some rare genes. The organism I am working with is not sequenced yet, but it should be till the end of this year. My question is which type of library is more suitable for quantification, a random primed cDNA library or a 3’UTR library, which proposed me a company. But what would be the advantage of a 3’UTR library? Thank you very much! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|