![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Offering a user-paid NGS analysis pipeline in the cloud | schelhorn | Bioinformatics | 0 | 08-25-2011 03:04 AM |
Companies offering NGS data analysis including RNAseq | agseq | Bioinformatics | 0 | 05-05-2011 07:24 AM |
turn-key next gen companies | msincan | General | 8 | 08-11-2010 11:33 PM |
DNAnexus free account: next-gen sequence analysis in the cloud | DNAnexus | Vendor Forum | 0 | 04-27-2010 11:46 PM |
Software packages for next gen sequence analysis | sci_guy | Bioinformatics | 236 | 12-25-2009 06:45 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Location: uk Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 110
|
![]()
Hi all,
I am new to this field and am currently doing some background research. I'm just wondering initially if there are many (any?) companies out there who offer next gen sequence analysis services? Thanks in advance ![]() Gavin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: Oakland, California Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 236
|
![]()
Several sequencing centres do (including the one where I'm currently studying). However, you might want to specify which technology you're looking for, as it may make a difference in terms of what people suggest for you.
__________________
The more you know, the more you know you don't know. —Aristotle |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Location: Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 246
|
![]()
Yes, as apfejes mentioned, there are plenty of companies that provide a range of services for next gen sequencing and analysis... also including ours :-)
Have you seen this list? I know it's not listing analysis services alone, but I think there will be many in there that can do it. http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=948 Maybe we should start a second list for analysis services... Scott. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
--Site Admin--
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,358
|
![]()
Go for it, or I can move this one to the Service Providers forum.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Location: uk Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 110
|
![]()
Thnaks for the replies!
From my perspective, a separate list for analysis services would be useful but I don't know what other members' opinions are? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Location: Southern France Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 269
|
![]()
I totally agree: a specific list for analysis services (from academia, companies, sequencing centers..) would be definitely more than useful!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Location: uk Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 110
|
![]()
Any volunteers or alternatively suggestions on how to go about creating this list? As it stands I wouldn't know where to start.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Location: Southern France Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 269
|
![]()
Potentially interesting info could be:
Name of the analysis tool URL Source: company name, institute Price: free or $oft Supported machines (platform) OS: Linux, Mac, Windows, public web based platform.. GUI: none (command line), yes, web-based, with genome browser.. Input: raw image, fastq reads, alignment files, BED files.. Output: numbers, tables, graphs, Excel sheets.. Ref (papers, if any) Base calling: Y/N + method Read alignment: Y/N + method Read assembly: Y/N + method SNP calling: N/Y + method Genomic variations, etc: Y/N + method Gene expression: Y/N + method (RPKM, etc) Other features Thoughts, comments? Anybody else interested? Additional suggestions before starting the table? (a new thread in the service providers section i guess?) s. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Senior Member
Location: Boston area Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 747
|
![]() Quote:
For example, if something is a service then the OS & GUI seem pretty irrelevant questions. Perhaps you do want to include free services, but then only the web-based ones and not anything that requires installation locally beyond getting the right common accessories (Java runtime, Flash, etc) If as a Wiki, rather than a bunch of Y/N it would probably make more sense to have a compact (but expandable) set of keywords with agreed meaning. Those might be in larger categories (again, the software Wiki is a good model to start with). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|