Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SHRiMP 2 output problem

    Hi,

    I used SHRiMP 2.2.2 for mapping (gapped mapping) SOLiD Paired End data to hg19 genome reference. The SAM output file does not have any value at QV column, instead has "*" as a placeholder. For example:

    271_822_1591_F 163 chrM 1 255 35M = 146 194 GATCACAGGTCTATCACCCTATTAACCACTCACGG * AS:i:310 NM:i:0 CS:Z:T12321112012233211002330301311222130 CM:i:2 XX:Z:GATCACAGGTCTATCACCCTATTAACcACTCaCGG
    86_1077_1408_F 163 chrM 1 255 3H32M = 126 175 GATCACAGGTCTATCACCCTATTAACCACTCA * AS:i:320 NM:i:0 CS:Z:T33102321112012233211002330301011221 CM:i:0 XX:Z:GATCACAGGTCTATCACCCTATTAACCACTCA

    I understand this because SHRiMP 2 never asks for .qual filename/s when put on run. Now almost all the variant calling algorithms such as SNVer, VarScan, GATK etc. require base/color quality values for evaluation of their variant call and end up giving error. Even the mpileup/bcftools seem to be giving abnormal results with almost all of the variant calls as In-Dels. Is there anyway I can make SHRiMP2 give out value to QV column in output so that I can run the variant calling tools on it?

    My SHRiMP 2.2.2 run was:

    gmapper-cs \
    --max-alignments 800 \
    -N 12 \
    --pair-mode opp-in \
    --isize 0,250 \
    --all-contigs \
    --single-best-mapping \
    --local \
    --sam \
    -1 trimmed_read_F3_50bp.csfasta -2 read_F5.csfasta \
    hg19.ucsc.fa > output_trimmed_50bp.sam 2> output_trimmed_50bp.log

    Thanks in advance

  • #2
    The *csfasta files do not have any quality information, you probably need to input the *qual files as well.

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi nilshomer,

      Thanks for the suggestion. Although SHRiMP, in general, does not give any separate option for .qual files in the run, I did try to incorporate qual files along with csfasta; but it prompts and error, indicating that it does not recognize the .qual format.
      One suggestion has been recommended to me by SNVer authors is to include a dummy value in QUAL field of SHRiMP SAM output such as "IIIII" (size of SEQ length) for all mapped reads so as to generate variant calls without runtime error. But then, that would affect the filter process of the variants.
      I have also come across the variant calling tool VARiD that shows an example of working on SHRiMP mapping output. I might give a try to VARiD. Do you know how good is VARiD tool for variant calling?

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
        by seqadmin


        The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
        Yesterday, 07:01 AM
      • seqadmin
        Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
        by seqadmin


        Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
        04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
      0 responses
      50 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
      0 responses
      44 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
      0 responses
      55 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...
      X