![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
BLAST+ creating custom blast database and using blast+ filtering features | deniz | Bioinformatics | 3 | 07-07-2019 09:04 AM |
BLAST Help | BioTalk | Bioinformatics | 32 | 12-09-2011 03:10 PM |
BLAST+ vs BLASTALL (legacy BLAST) | Symphysodon | Bioinformatics | 4 | 10-25-2011 03:52 PM |
BLAST database error - when changing to new BLAST+ local program | biobio | Bioinformatics | 4 | 06-15-2011 06:20 AM |
blast | AndyOD | Bioinformatics | 3 | 03-07-2010 06:59 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: quebec Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 35
|
![]()
Hi all,
I would like to filter out the reads which matches with the repeats from miRNA seq data. I am planing to use blastn to blast my data against the repeats fasta file from Repbase (http://www.girinst.org/censor/index.php). Will it work? Because there is a RMBlast on RepeatMasker home page which is a RepeatMasker compatible version of the standard NCBI BLAST suite. Here is the description for RMBlast: The primary difference between this distribution and the NCBI distribution is the addition of a new program "rmblastn" for use with RepeatMasker and RepeatModeler. RMBlast supports RepeatMasker searches by adding a few necessary features to the stock NCBI blastn program. These include: • Support for custom matrices ( without KA-Statistics ). • Support for cross_match-like complexity adjusted scoring. Cross_match is Phil Green's seeded smith-waterman search algorithm. • Support for cross_match-like masklevel filtering. I just want to find the match between my short reads with the repeat database.So what is the difference? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: Vancouver, BC Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 275
|
![]()
I would not worry about the differences for your purposes because it sounds like you are just interested in filtering reads. For that task, I think it's fine to just create a database and filter your reads based on matches. Make sure to turn off complexity filtering though.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|