![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
pre-filtering before mapping? | NanYu | SOLiD | 9 | 03-29-2012 03:29 AM |
pre-filtering before running alignment: help needed | angerusso | Bioinformatics | 2 | 11-15-2011 07:49 PM |
filtering mpileup results | Hit | Bioinformatics | 1 | 07-01-2011 08:46 AM |
when do you pre-process Illumina reads before analysis? | PFS | Bioinformatics | 15 | 04-28-2011 04:06 PM |
filtering pre-mRNA | chrisbala | Bioinformatics | 0 | 11-19-2010 09:15 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Location: USA Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 55
|
![]()
I tried to run TopHat/Cufflinks using Illumina reads without and without quality-filtering. I noticed that the results of differential expression analysis are significantly different. For example, a gene that was highly DE when reads were not pre-filtered, was absolutely unchanged when reads were pre-filtered.
Why would the removal of BAD quality reads affect the results so dramatically? Thanks! Note: prefiltering = remove the pairs where one of the mate has all bases with quality < 2. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|