SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bioinformatics Programmer I baylorrecruiter Academic/Non-Profit Jobs 0 04-04-2012 01:15 PM
Bioinformatics ac422 Bioinformatics 0 07-11-2011 05:18 AM
Bioinformatics Analyst/Senior Bioinformatics Analyst wzhang Academic/Non-Profit Jobs 0 04-13-2011 01:00 PM
Bioinformatics Analyst/Senior Bioinformatics Analyst ngs2011 Academic/Non-Profit Jobs 0 02-25-2011 10:53 AM
Bioinformatics bioinfosm Bioinformatics 1 04-16-2008 09:06 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-10-2012, 08:41 PM   #1
Marcela Uliano
Member
 
Location: Berlin, Germany

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 18
Default bioinformatics

Hey guys!

I was wondering how should I interpret the quality scores coming from results from 454 GS jr cDNA (not paired end) reads?

I mean, I read a lot that its prhed-like. But as the sequencing techniques from sanger and pyrosequencing are so different from each other, I wonder if its true.

Could you help me find literature about these quality scores thing and to be able to understand by analyzing my data if the quality of my reads are good or not?

Im a little confuse about that and havent got to any conclusions so far.

Thanks a lot!
Marcela Uliano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 03:57 AM   #2
maubp
Peter (Biopython etc)
 
Location: Dundee, Scotland, UK

Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,543
Default

Well they are using the same PHRED logarithmic scoring scale (probability of error), but given the typical error in Roche 454 reads is in homopolymer repeat number this doesn't map well to a per-base quality score.
maubp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 06:40 AM   #3
Marcela Uliano
Member
 
Location: Berlin, Germany

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 18
Default

Thanks maubp

So the quality valeu coming with the sff file or the one from the fasta format (fna), the .qual are based on PHRED logarithmic scale?
Marcela Uliano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 06:43 AM   #4
maubp
Peter (Biopython etc)
 
Location: Dundee, Scotland, UK

Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,543
Default

The SFF file contains the called bases (which can be turned into a FASTA file) and the associated per-base PHRED quality scores (which can be turned into a QUAL file).

It might help to change the title of your thread from 'Bioinformatics' to something like 'Interpreting Roche 454 per-base quality scores'.
maubp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 07:08 AM   #5
Marcela Uliano
Member
 
Location: Berlin, Germany

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 18
Default

Thanks a lot maubp!

Ill do that. But you, pretty much, have already helped me to solve my doubt!
Marcela Uliano is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
454 sequencing, good-quality-reads, phred score, quality score, sff

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO