bwa mem with paired/unpaired reads

mchaisso · 09-09-2013, 10:26 AM

I have a quick question for all bwa mem users (or author, if you have time Heng).

I have some reads from a simulated exome study that have been modified to have a 50/50 allele balance with one allele having a 3 bp deletion at a particular locus. The reads that cover this locus are paired, and so I have a set of reads:
reads.f.fq, and reads.r.fq

If I align using the paired reads:
bwa mem ref.fa reads.f.fq reads.r.fq ...

and process the results with samtools mpileup, no variant is found.

However, if I concatenate the read files together, and align without pairing:
cat reads.f.fq reads.r.fq > reads.fq
bwa mem ref.fa reads.fq ...

the variant is discovered as expected.

Just in case I had the orientation of the reverse reads incorrect, I tried the first command with the reverse complement of the read.r.fq file, without success.

Is there any bwa mem output I should look for that would indicate improper mate-pairing or other invalid input?

thanks,
-mark

dpryan · 09-09-2013, 11:08 AM

Just look at the output BAM in IGV.

mchaisso · 09-09-2013, 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dpryan

Just look at the output BAM in IGV.

Good comment - it is often good to review the sanity of the alignments in a viewer. I neglected to mention that the indels appear in both the paired and unpaired alignments in IGV, as well as bwa aln based alignments. Samtools mpileup detects the indel with the bwa aln based alignments.

-mark

dpryan · 09-09-2013, 11:43 AM

One thing to keep in mind when you treat them as unpaired, is that your coverage doubles. That could make the difference.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
BWA-MEM: output mapped reads larger than input reads	Kennels	Bioinformatics	9	09-05-2013 06:27 PM
why the properly paired results from bwa mem is an odd number	Pengfei Liu	Bioinformatics	2	08-24-2013 07:26 PM
bam to paired AND unpaired fastq reads	Kennels	Bioinformatics	4	06-18-2013 11:55 PM
Unpaired reads in paired data	Nick	General	0	06-22-2011 08:19 AM

09-09-2013, 10:26 AM	#1
mchaisso Member Location: Seattle, WA Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 84	bwa mem with paired/unpaired reads I have a quick question for all bwa mem users (or author, if you have time Heng). I have some reads from a simulated exome study that have been modified to have a 50/50 allele balance with one allele having a 3 bp deletion at a particular locus. The reads that cover this locus are paired, and so I have a set of reads: reads.f.fq, and reads.r.fq If I align using the paired reads: bwa mem ref.fa reads.f.fq reads.r.fq ... and process the results with samtools mpileup, no variant is found. However, if I concatenate the read files together, and align without pairing: cat reads.f.fq reads.r.fq > reads.fq bwa mem ref.fa reads.fq ... the variant is discovered as expected. Just in case I had the orientation of the reverse reads incorrect, I tried the first command with the reverse complement of the read.r.fq file, without success. Is there any bwa mem output I should look for that would indicate improper mate-pairing or other invalid input? thanks, -mark

09-09-2013, 11:08 AM	#2
dpryan Devon Ryan Location: Freiburg, Germany Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 3,480	Just look at the output BAM in IGV.

09-09-2013, 11:43 AM	#4
dpryan Devon Ryan Location: Freiburg, Germany Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 3,480	One thing to keep in mind when you treat them as unpaired, is that your coverage doubles. That could make the difference.