![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is left end (_1.fq) of normally mapped reads always positive strand? | bioiion | Illumina/Solexa | 2 | 02-15-2012 08:19 AM |
Reads not mapped in proper pair: Bowtie output | RGP | Bioinformatics | 4 | 12-14-2011 07:21 AM |
paired-end reads mapped to genome.. gene with only one direction of paired-end reads? | danwiththeplan | Bioinformatics | 2 | 09-22-2011 03:06 AM |
tophat paired reads mapped to different chromosomes | wenhuang | Bioinformatics | 3 | 06-23-2010 06:23 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: TX Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 9
|
![]()
Hi all,
I am new to the RNA seq world. I have processed bunch of illumina paired end reads. The reported alignment is only 49%.. When I use bowtie to map each pair of the paired-end reads, I got 80% of the reads mapped. bowtie -n 3 -p 10 --best -e 200 --trim5 15 --trim3 25 --sam BowtieIndexes/mm9 -1 Raw_files/sample-1_export.fq -2 sample-2_export.fq sample.sam # reads processed: 21482797 # reads with at least one reported alignment: 10637665 (49.52%) # reads that failed to align: 10845132 (50.48%) Reported 10637665 paired-end alignments to 1 output stream(s) I was wondering if this is normal. Here's the command and output. Thanks. P.S.: This is my 3rd post on this forum. I posted a similar question in my 2nd post. However, I can no longer reply that post. ----- I couldn't post a reply, so here it goes ---- Isn't it that tophat also uses bowtie to align reads? Last edited by zack80.liu; 03-02-2011 at 03:48 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: Australia Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 136
|
![]()
You shouldn't be using bowtie for RNA-seq (especially with PE reads) - try tophat or another one of the splicing-aware aligners
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Location: TX Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 9
|
![]()
Isn't tophat also use bowtie to do the alignment?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Location: Cambridge, UK Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 625
|
![]()
Dear Zack,
The most likely explanation would indeed be that a sizeable fraction of you library fragments are spanning a splice junction. In these cases many fragments in your library are longer than the allowed Bowtie default fragment size of 250bp (These parameters can be adjusted with -I/--minins <int> Default: 0. -X/--maxins <int> Default: 250) Using TopHat or any other splice junction aware aligner should indeed fix your problems. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|