Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • edgeR, "DGELIst" function, "group" parameter

    Hi,

    I am using edgeR for some RNASeq analysis. My question concerns the DGEList function and its "group" parameter. I realized that, whether doing group=mydesignfactor or group=rep(1,ncol(counts)), the cpm numbers that I get after
    counts.TMM <- calcNormFactors(counts.DGEList)
    cpm.TMM=cpm(counts.TMM, normalized.lib.sizes=TRUE)
    are strictly identical in either case. The only difference between both ways is that the counts.TMM$samples$group column duly reflects what I put in in "group".

    Is this normal? What is it that I am missing? Is the "group" nevertheless taken into account on the subsequent estimateGLMCommonDisp, estimateGLMTrendDisp, estimateGLMTagDisp, glmFit, glmLRT etc.?

    Thanks in advance for your help.

    Best,

    David Rengel

  • #2
    There's no reason that cpm should be dependent upon your experimental design (in fact, it shouldn't be). The various GLM function pay attention to the design, since that's where it's important.

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi dpryan,

      THanks for your reply. Yes, that is right. My only only doubt came from de fact that if normalized.lib.sizes=TRUE, then the cpm are calculated using the normalization factors, which I thought were somehow dependent on your experimental design, but it seems I was mistaken.

      David

      Comment


      • #4
        Correct, normalization factors are independent from experimental design.

        Comment


        • #5
          Thanks a lot!

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • seqadmin
            Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
            by seqadmin


            The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
            Yesterday, 07:01 AM
          • seqadmin
            Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
            by seqadmin


            Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
            04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
          0 responses
          45 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
          0 responses
          46 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
          0 responses
          39 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
          0 responses
          55 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Working...
          X