SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Applications Forums > Sample Prep / Library Generation



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
QIAquick Absorption Peak at 230nm rather than 260 skblazer Sample Prep / Library Generation 24 09-29-2015 08:46 AM
Ampure versus Ampure XP seqgirl123 Sample Prep / Library Generation 49 03-19-2015 03:02 AM
Covaris S2 shearing for small amounts of DNA wanderingneuroscientist Sample Prep / Library Generation 5 11-07-2011 12:24 AM
amplication free whole genome seq with small amounts of starting material. kingsalex Sample Prep / Library Generation 3 01-20-2011 04:43 AM
PubMed: Profiling DNA methylation from small amounts of genomic DNA starting material Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 11-07-2008 09:30 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-21-2010, 11:42 AM   #1
Scotch
Junior Member
 
Location: Maryland

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 6
Default Ampure versus Qiaquick for small amounts of DNA

Does anyone have any experience using either Ampure or the Qiaquick qiagen columns to clean up small amounts of DNA? I'm only starting with 100ng of DNA and want to lose as little as possible along the way. Which one gives the best DNA recovery? Many thanks in advance.
Scotch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2010, 01:22 PM   #2
ECO
--Site Admin--
 
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,358
Default

AMPure. No contest in my experience. Even with MinElute.
ECO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2010, 06:12 AM   #3
GW_OK
Senior Member
 
Location: Oklahoma

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 411
Default

I'll echo ECO. Ampure is the best DNA purification process going at the moment.
GW_OK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2010, 02:52 PM   #4
captainentropy
Member
 
Location: San Francisco Bay Area

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 89
Default

I recently make a library (Illumina protocol) from 100ng of ChIPed DNA and I used Qiagen columns and measured the recovery after each step using Qubit. After step 1 (end repair) I recovered almost 100%, after step 2 (A-base addition) about 70%, and after step 3 (adapter ligation) about 75%. However, I use 37 degree buffer EB and elute twice. (so basically I started with 100ng and ended up with a bit over 50ng going into the size selection step).

I've tried Ampure and the recovery was good but took a lot longer. A neighboring lab recently tested Ampure, Ampure XP, and Qiagen and the Ampure XP was the best in their hands. We'll switch to Ampure XP when we run out of the minelute columns.
captainentropy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2010, 03:54 PM   #5
SeqR&D
Member
 
Location: San Diego

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 26
Default

Just watch your elution volume with the Ampure beads. If you add 90uL of beads, your min amount to elute is ~30uL for best results...you can stretch with 20uL.
SeqR&D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2011, 05:42 PM   #6
yoon
Junior Member
 
Location: Boston

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6
Default

Hello,
Can I know when you wash ampure xp beads with 70%. Do you pipet and mix the beads with the etoh? also I was thinking if you can spin the beads down before putting it on the magnet?? Do you guys have any reservations regarding this?
yoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2011, 06:36 PM   #7
ECO
--Site Admin--
 
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,358
Default

You can resuspend in EtOH but it's main function is salt removal so it's somewhat
overkill.

You can absolutely spin down the beads at any stage, however if you spin hard for longer than about 30 seconds the pellet is difficult to resuspend.
ECO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2011, 06:38 PM   #8
ECO
--Site Admin--
 
Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,358
Default

Also as long as we're posting tips...thorough mixing during binding (for at least 2-3 min) is essential for high yields (>85%). A slow rotator is not enough for small volumes.
ECO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2011, 12:41 AM   #9
zhengz
Member
 
Location: sweden

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 23
Default

Thank you very much for sharing the tips, ECO!
zhengz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2011, 02:04 AM   #10
niceday
Member
 
Location: cambridge

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 68
Default

ECO is that 2-3 minutes on a vortex?

I recently eluted some samples after ampure cleanup. Out of curiosity I re-eluted the beads for 3 hours and got 15% DNA back. I'll be speaking to some people to find out if this is the norm.
niceday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2011, 07:50 AM   #11
SeqR&D
Member
 
Location: San Diego

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 26
Default

1. It is recommended to use freshly prepared 80% EtOH.
2. 15 min incubation to bind DNA with multiple vortexing steps during this time period...~10sec per vortex should be fine...just mix things up.
3. It is okay to pipet the beads with the EtOH to mix them (I call this "triterating"), but I usually mix them using the magnet...back and forth. BUT, you can also just add the EtOH and do no mixing at all.
4. As it is recommended to elute 90uL of beads with no less than 30uL, I have sucessfully eluted 160uL of beads with 17uL, with minimal losses...just give it a little extra time.
5. I always spin down my tubes after any mixing/vortexing prior to placing tubes back on the magnet or leaving for further incubation...just a quick spin to get stuff off the tube walls...not compacting the beads.
6. There are better "cleaners/concentrators" than Qiagen...maybe the Zymo...as far as losses go. AMpure XP seems to be the best for yields, but does take much longer. For Qiagen-type column units I tend to bind the DNA twice, and elute twice...same PB/EB, just put it back into the column and spin again. Also, let the EB sit for at least 1min on the filter before spinning.
SeqR&D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2017, 08:35 AM   #12
youbaosha
Junior Member
 
Location: us

Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 1
Default

Will switch from Qiagen to Ampure xp!
youbaosha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2017, 08:50 AM   #13
austinso
Member
 
Location: Bay area

Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 76
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by niceday View Post
ECO is that 2-3 minutes on a vortex?

I recently eluted some samples after ampure cleanup. Out of curiosity I re-eluted the beads for 3 hours and got 15% DNA back. I'll be speaking to some people to find out if this is the norm.
Just to add clarification, usually the loss is associated with the "dead volume" (i.e. the liquid between beads) and sometimes the wetting of the plastic surface. So the more beads you use, the greater the dead volume and the poorer your recovery.

In my experience it also depends on how "flattened" the magnetized pellet is, which is why sometimes I use really strong rare-earth magnets for the post wash elution rather than anything on a stand.
austinso is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
ampure qiaquick cleanup

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO