Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • How to group reads from same duplex DNA fragment (Sureselect XT HS) grouping by UMI

    Hello everybody,

    I am trying to analyse a dataset generated using Sureselect XT-HS.

    I have three fastq files: forward, reverse and UMIs.

    For example:

    # FORWARD
    (base) [k1506263@login3(rosalind) HUMfeqzR]$ zcat 001MS/210601_I100400190019_V350004379_L1_001MS_1.fq.gz |head
    @V350004379L1C001R0010000005:0:0:0:0 1:N:0:TCTCTTCA
    TCCCTTTCTCTCCTTGGTACTTCTCTGCCAAATCCCTCCCAGAGAAACAGAGAACTTCTTTCTCTACCTGAACCAGGTTTTTAGGAAATGGGCCTTTTTC
    +
    GG?G?F@FGGGFGFB;FGGGGEAEGGEFG7GF>EGFD2DBFGCGBGGGAEBF?@?FGGGFFGFFDGFGEFFE@GDCF?GGFGEFG<EGEGFECFF76=AG
    @V350004379L1C001R0010000006:0:0:0:0 1:N:0:TCTCTTCA
    CCTACCAGACCCTTCAGTGAAGCTTTGATGATGGGCTTACTGACCAACCTGGCAGACAGGGAGCTGGTTCACATGATCAACTGGGCGAAGAGGGTGCCAG
    +
    FGE<FFFB1F;G=@FDFGD-F8@GB(F>>9F?CFCGFDFGCFD9EFGGEC6FBEB2*EEF(;7FGEF@F?EAEAF8CFB4?FD>FC9FFD7EFF?FF@F@
    @V350004379L1C001R0010000028:0:0:0:0 1:N:0:TCTCTTCA
    CGCCAATTTTAGCCTCTTTGCCCCCTTTGGCAGTGGCTGCCCAGTCAATGGGCAGAGCCAGCTGAGGGGGGCCTTTGGAAGTGGGGCGCTGCCCACTGGC

    # REVERSE
    (base) [k1506263@login3(rosalind) HUMfeqzR]$ zcat 001MS/210601_I100400190019_V350004379_L1_001MS_2.fq.gz | head
    @V350004379L1C001R0010000005:0:0:0:0 2:N:0:TCTCTTCA
    GGCCTCAGAAGACAGAAGAGAGACTGGGTTATTCCTCCCATCAGCTGCCCAGAAAATGAAAAAGGCCCATTTCCTAAAAACCCGGGTCAGGGAGAGAAAG
    +
    EDDDFD;B02/8F;F@DE:FFFEA<CAFDF?FFCF>FFF9FFA89@C=FF7CFFF77>-F4;FEF:FFFCBF,F93CA4FEC'97(G9CB;49*-F'=E9
    @V350004379L1C001R0010000006:0:0:0:0 2:N:0:TCTCTTCA
    ACTATTTCTCCCATGACATCACAACAAGTTCTTGAAAAGCTATTGACTCTTAAAAGCAGCGCTTCGCATTCTTACCTGGCACCCTCTTCGCCCAGGTGAT
    +
    FDAEFDFFFFFF;8FEED;CGAFDFDDFFFFDFD<F7AFFFEF=F@?FF=>AFF>FA'F>?FEA<?ECFF?CGDE@/2AD,F@C@FCF5?FF6EE.;FF/
    @V350004379L1C001R0010000028:0:0:0:0 2:N:0:TCTCTTCA
    CCCAAAAAATATTGCCATTTTTCTGACCTTGGTAAGCAGCTGGGAATAGTAGGCAGGGCCAGTGGGCAGCGCCCCACTTCCAAAGGCCCCCCTCAGCTGG

    # UMIS
    (base) [k1506263@login3(rosalind) HUMfeqzR]$ zcat UMI/210601_I100400190019_V350004379_L1_CHKPE85221050164-0/001MS_out2.fq.gz | head
    @V350004379L1C001R0010000005:0:0:0:0 2:N:0:TCTCTTCA
    TACAGGGGAG
    +
    )EEE>CFC9F
    @V350004379L1C001R0010000006:0:0:0:0 2:N:0:TCTCTTCA
    GTATAACCCT
    +
    F>EEFFEFFD
    @V350004379L1C001R0010000028:0:0:0:0 2:N:0:TCTCTTCA

    I believe that the Sureselect protocol produces reads from "duplex" fragments where you can identify pairs of reads coming from opposite DNA strands of the same DNA fragment and use that information to group the mapped reads. But I can't seem to find how that information is encoded within the UMI tags. In other words, how can which reads come from the same DNA fragment but opposite strands since they have different UMI tags?

    Below is the pipeline I was using to process the data. I am using gatk (Picard) and fgbio and I was ignoring any "duplex" DNA information as I do not know how to identify or group reads that "come" from the same DNA fragment. In particular, I was using GroupReadsByUmi with the "adjacency" option, not paired as I didn't have UMI tags in the format described in fgbio docs (e.g. ACGT-CCGG) and CallMolecularConsensusReads (instead of CallDuplexConsensusReads).

    Anybody can give any clues on how to approach this? Thanks in advance for you help.

    ##Generate read alignments andUMIs
    #"Read trimming".
    # e.g.
    trim_galore --fastqc --paired --cores 4 --gzip --output_dir /scratch/groups/hodgkinsonlab/gcarbajo/projects/ctDNA/analysis/trimgalore/001MS /scratch/groups/hodgkinsonlab/gcarbajo/projects/ctDNA/data/ctDNA_IBIMA/HUMfeqzR/001MS/*_1.fq.gz /scratch/groups/hodgkinsonlab/gcarbajo/projects/ctDNA/data/ctDNA_IBIMA/HUMfeqzR/001MS/*_2.fq.gz
    # Filter the UMI file to keep only the UMIs for the reads that passed the trimming
    # Custom perl script that keeps the IDs for reads that pass the trimming
    # Generate and "unmapped bam" with Fastq2Bam. Based on (https://github.com/fulcrumgenomics/f...ead-Structures ) to codify the barcode (10M)

    e.g.
    fgbio FastqToBam -i ../analysis/trimgalore/001MS/*val_1.fq.gz ../analysis/trimgalore/001MS/*val_2.fq.gz 001MS.trimmed.UMIs.fq.gz -o /dev/stdout --read-structures +T +T 10M --sample=001MS --library=001MS | samtools sort -n - |samtools view -Sb - > ../analysis/unmappedBamWithUMIs/001MS.unmapWUMI.srt.v3.bam
    # Map the reads with BWA ( piping amToFastq, bwa y MergeBamAlignment)
    # e.g.
    # Map it and merge with the UMIS
    gatk --java-options -Xmx32g SamToFastq -I ../analysis/unmappedBamWithUMIs/001MS.unmapWUMI.srt.v3.bam -F /dev/stdout -INTERLEAVE true | bwa mem -p -t 8 /mnt/lustre/groups/hodgkinsonlab/gcarbajo/annotation/hsapiens/hg38/GCA_000001405.15/GRCh38_no_alt_analysis_set_GCA_000001405.15.fasta.gz /dev/stdin | samtools sort -n - | samtools view -Sb - | gatk --java-options -Xmx32g MergeBamAlignment -UNMAPPED ../analysis/unmappedBamWithUMIs/001MS.unmapWUMI.srt.v3.bam -ALIGNED /dev/stdin -O ../analysis/mappedBamWithUMIs/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.bam -R /mnt/lustre/groups/hodgkinsonlab/gcarbajo/annotation/hsapiens/hg38/GCA_000001405.15/GRCh38_no_alt_analysis_set_GCA_000001405.15.fasta.gz -SO coordinate -ALIGNER_PROPER_PAIR_FLAGS true -MAX_GAPS -1 -ORIENTATIONS FR -VALIDATION_STRINGENCY SILENT -CREATE_INDEX true

    # Genrate consensus reads using "Adjacency" (details here: https://genome.cshlp.org/content/27/3/491.full)

    #e.g.
    fgbio GroupReadsByUmi -s Adjacency -i ../analysis/mappedBamWithUMIs/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.bam -o ../analysis/GroupedReadsByUmi/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.gbu.bam -f ../analysis/GroupedReadsByUmi/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.gbu.hist.txt > logs/001MS.GroupReadsByUmi.out 2>logs/001MS.GroupReadsByUmi.err

    #Generate consensus sequences:
    #e.g.
    fgbio CallMolecularConsensusReads --input ../analysis/GroupedReadsByUmi/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.gbu.bam --output ../analysis/CallMolecularConsensusReads/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.gbu.cons_unmap.bam --min-reads=1 --reject ../analysis/CallMolecularConsensusReads/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.gbu.cons_rej.bam > logs/001MS_CallMolecularConsensusReads.out 2>logs/001MS_CallMolecularConsensusReads.error


    #Map consensus.
    #e.g.
    gatk --java-options -Xmx32g SamToFastq -RGT A -I ../analysis/CallMolecularConsensusReads/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.gbu.cons_unmap.bam -F /dev/stdout -INTERLEAVE true | bwa mem -p -t 8 /mnt/lustre/groups/hodgkinsonlab/gcarbajo/annotation/hsapiens/hg38/GCA_000001405.15/GRCh38_no_alt_analysis_set_GCA_000001405.15.fasta.gz /dev/stdin | gatk SortSam -I /dev/stdin -O /dev/stdout -SO queryname | samtools view -Sb - | gatk --java-options -Xmx32g MergeBamAlignment -UNMAPPED ../analysis/CallMolecularConsensusReads/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.gbu.cons_unmap.bam -ALIGNED /dev/stdin -O ../analysis/consensusAligned/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.bam -R /mnt/lustre/groups/hodgkinsonlab/gcarbajo/annotation/hsapiens/hg38/GCA_000001405.15/GRCh38_no_alt_analysis_set_GCA_000001405.15.fasta.gz -SO coordinate -ALIGNER_PROPER_PAIR_FLAGS true -MAX_GAPS -1 -ORIENTATIONS FR -VALIDATION_STRINGENCY SILENT -CREATE_INDEX true
    Filtra las secuencias consenso (aquí me quedo con familias de 2 o más pero también he probado de 3)
    Por ejemplo:
    fgbio FilterConsensusReads -M 2 -N 30 -i ../analysis/consensusAligned/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.bam -o ../analysis/FilterConsensusReads/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.FCons.min2.bam -r /mnt/lustre/groups/hodgkinsonlab/gcarbajo/annotation/hsapiens/hg38/GCA_000001405.15/GRCh38_no_alt_analysis_set_GCA_000001405.15.fasta.gz > logs/001MS.FilterConsensusReads.min2.out 2> logs/001MS.FilterConsensusReads.min2.err

    "Call variants" con Mutect2
    Cortar las secuencias en las que se solapan las reads FW y reverse para solo contar una vez por fragmento
    Por ejemplo:
    fgbio ClipBam -Xmx32000M --clip-overlapping-reads -i ../analysis/FilterConsensusReads/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.FCons.min2.bam -o ../analysis/ClipBam/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.FCons.min2.clip.bam -m ../analysis/ClipBam/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.FCons.min2.clip.metrics.txt -r /mnt/lustre/groups/hodgkinsonlab/gcarbajo/annotation/hsapiens/hg38/GCA_000001405.15/GRCh38_no_alt_analysis_set_GCA_000001405.15.fasta.gz > logs/001MS.ClipBam.out 2> logs/001MS.ClipBam.err
    Detectar variantes:
    Por ejemplo:
    gatk Mutect2 -R /mnt/lustre/groups/hodgkinsonlab/gcarbajo/annotation/hsapiens/hg38/GCA_000001405.15/GRCh38_no_alt_analysis_set_GCA_000001405.15.fasta -I ../analysis/ClipBam/001MS.mappedWUMI.v3.FCons.min2.clip.bam -L ../data/bed_files/list.interval_list --germline-resource ../data/gatk-best-practices/somatic-hg38_af-only-gnomad.hg38.vcf.gz --panel-of-normals ../data/gatk-best-practices/somatic-hg38_1000g_pon.hg38.vcf.gz -O ../analysis/Mutecc2/001MS.min2.clip.vcf.gz > logs/001MS.mutect.min2.clip.out 2> logs/001MS.mutect.min2.clip.errh

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • seqadmin
    Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
    by seqadmin


    Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
    04-04-2024, 04:25 PM
  • seqadmin
    Strategies for Sequencing Challenging Samples
    by seqadmin


    Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...
    03-22-2024, 06:39 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
0 responses
24 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
0 responses
25 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
0 responses
22 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
0 responses
52 views
0 likes
Last Post seqadmin  
Working...
X