SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
velvet N50 bioenvisage De novo discovery 12 07-19-2013 05:50 AM
n50 value for transcriptome assembly Ramprasad Bioinformatics 0 10-16-2011 10:18 PM
N50 less than 2000 sarbashis Illumina/Solexa 4 09-07-2011 03:06 AM
Optimal k-mer and N50? AronaldJ De novo discovery 1 12-28-2010 09:03 AM
absolute k-mer coverage explained (Abyss) harrb Bioinformatics 1 12-21-2010 01:01 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-12-2021, 01:45 PM   #21
renekat
Junior Member
 
Location: Port St Lucie

Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 1
Default Clarification is stats.sh BBTools

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Bushnell View Post
I maintain that using "L" to denote a number and "N" to denote a length are just wrong, and I don't know how that got started. So I always define L50 as a length and N50 as a number. But Quast, for example, does use "L50" to indicate the number of contigs and "N50" to denote a length.
Hello,
I think that makes sense and just want to verify that in the BBTools stats.sh and statswrapper.sh N50 is for counts and L50 is for length. Is that correct?
Thanks so much,
René
renekat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
assembly, n50, sequence assembly

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO