SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Sequencing Technologies/Companies > Illumina/Solexa



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Biases in NGS Library Prep Genohub Sample Prep / Library Generation 0 01-23-2014 12:11 PM
The NEXTflex™ PCR-Free DNA Sequencing Kit Reduces Bias in NGS Library Prep Bioo Scientific Vendor Forum 10 12-20-2012 07:10 AM
Library prep woes – unusual bioanalyzer profile of Illumina RNA-seq library petey Sample Prep / Library Generation 1 11-19-2012 09:00 AM
Sample Prep for NGS Library addyblanch Sample Prep / Library Generation 2 08-30-2012 06:08 AM
NGS library prep on crosslinked chromatin Janiz Sample Prep / Library Generation 0 03-15-2012 09:31 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-23-2014, 08:32 AM   #1
seq-ngs
Junior Member
 
Location: GA

Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3
Default Library Prep for Cancer NGS

Hi all,

I am designing several cancer panels to run on the MiSeq. Each panel consists of 600-800 amplicons - approximately 150 bp each. What I am pondering right now is the library prep method to use. There are 5 main options:

1. Illumina - TSCA
2. Life Tech - AmpliSeq
3. Agilent - Haloplex
4. NuGen
5. Qiagen

We deal with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples that are degraded and often of low DNA quantity/quality. I like Ampliseq better than TSCA because it is multiplex PCR rather than probe hybridization (like Illumina) but don't want to run Ampliseq on the MiSeq because the Life Tech people seem not to like that. Any thoughts on a good library prep method from the choices above for FFPE samples? Thanks so much for any input.
seq-ngs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2015, 08:02 AM   #2
shrutimish@gmail.com
Member
 
Location: Chicago

Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 12
Default

I would also like to know more about why Life Tech does not like Ampliseq on the Miseq?
shrutimish@gmail.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2015, 06:14 AM   #3
pmiguel
Senior Member
 
Location: Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,317
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shrutimish@gmail.com View Post
I would also like to know more about why Life Tech does not like Ampliseq on the Miseq?
What makes you think that this is the case?

Life Tech has their own sequencer, by the way.

--
Phillip
pmiguel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2015, 06:56 AM   #4
shrutimish@gmail.com
Member
 
Location: Chicago

Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 12
Default

I asked this question "Life Tech does not like Ampliseq on the Miseq" because the previous person commented that. So, do you think it is not an issue? Can we actually use Ampliseq for target enrichment and run it on MiSeq?
Also, when you say life tech has their own sequencer- Are you talking about the Ion torrent sequencer?

Thanks in advance for answering these questions.
shrutimish@gmail.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2015, 08:47 AM   #5
thomasblomquist
Member
 
Location: Ohio

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 68
Default

I do it all the time. I have my target specific primers with "tails on them." These tails are "universal" sequences alien to the genome your targeting. I then add on the "platform" specific P5/P7 tails with R1/R2 priming regions for Illumina, or the Forward and Reverse sequencing tails for Ion Torrent to complete the job.

Wham bam, the results that get spit out (for genotyping purposes) are pretty much similar.

Now, and this is a big IF, you are trying to QUANTIFY rare alleles, the detection limits for that give base variation between the different loci will be HIGHLY PLATFORM DEPENDENT.

For the most part Illumina Error profile is quite good. And cost wise, is easier/cheaper to get up and running. Ion Torrent with its heterodimer bead issues can create problems with similar templates that vary by a single allele; especially in low complexity libraries.

Ion torrent, if done right, can have a VERY QUICK turn around, and can be used for quick identification once the assay is well characterized.

Best of luck.

-Tom Blomquist
thomasblomquist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2015, 01:01 PM   #6
shrutimish@gmail.com
Member
 
Location: Chicago

Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 12
Default

Thanks Tom for your reply. It is very useful to know this.
shrutimish@gmail.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO