SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > Bioinformatics > Bioinformatics



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cuffdiff p-value distributions and replicates dlawrence Bioinformatics 10 08-24-2015 04:04 AM
Allele Distributions jkozubek Bioinformatics 3 05-13-2013 03:29 PM
read length distributions? greigite Illumina/Solexa 1 12-01-2009 07:42 AM
PubMed: Statistical Distributions of Pyrosequencing. Newsbot! Literature Watch 0 12-17-2008 05:03 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-10-2014, 06:54 AM   #1
Anthony.287
Member
 
Location: Ohio

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 95
Default Revisiting Linux distributions...

Morning!
First, a bit of background. Currently, my lab (a core facility) is using the 454 FLX+. Our data rig, which we use for the Roche software suite and not much else, is running RHEL 6, and our purchase with Red Hat has expired. RHEL has been quite a pain, what with the dependencies and all, and our lack of an in-house Linux expert. Im currently trying to get QIIME up and running, but our subscription to Red Hat has expired so we have no support, which means I cant update software or acquire the dependencies needed for QIIME. There has been some talk of moving from the 454 to an Illumina platform, but that could be years in the future.
I guess my question is should we renew our RHEL subscription, or move to a different Linux distribution? Wed like to be able to provide as much bioinformatics to our clients as possible, as painlessly as possible, and not have to worry about this for a long time.
Thank you!!
Anthony.287 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2014, 07:07 AM   #2
molecules
MU Informatics Research Core F
 
Location: Columbia, MO

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6
Default

CentOS (http://www.centos.org/) is the effectively the same thing as RHEL. It doesn't come with support, but it is free.
molecules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2014, 07:09 AM   #3
molecules
MU Informatics Research Core F
 
Location: Columbia, MO

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6
Default

However, if you don't have a Linux expert on hand, it may be worth paying RHEL for support. That's a decision you'll have to make.
molecules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2014, 08:13 AM   #4
TonyBrooks
Senior Member
 
Location: London

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 298
Default

The disadvantage of switching from RHEL is that AFAIK that and Fedora are the only distros supported by Roche. I generally steer clear of Fedora as it's lifespans are typically short (new versions every 6 months and package maintenance for about a year)

If you do move away, the best ones to go for is either CentOS or Ubuntu but initial set up may be more complicated than it is than the push-button installs in RHEL/Fedora.
Having said that, there are walkthroughs for install on non supported distos;

http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8944
TonyBrooks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2014, 08:32 AM   #5
GenoMax
Senior Member
 
Location: East Coast USA

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,077
Default

Have you checked around to see if there is a campus license for RedHat available (if you are at an academic campus that is a possibility) that you could take advantage of?

I may get flamed for saying this but if you have no in house expertise on linux administration (and have managed to keep your server afloat/secure so far with RHEL) then the path of least resistance would be to bite the bullet and buy the RHEL maintenance. Fully justifiable, if Roche is your main (only?) business.

If you do manage to install Roche software on an unsupported OS, any time there is a problem Roche tech support would likely throw up their hands and say that you are on your own.
GenoMax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2014, 10:35 AM   #6
andylemire
Member
 
Location: Virginia

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 15
Default

There's only about two and a half years left with 454 support anyway (mid-2016). Seems to me that buying into RHEL for another year or two to support this platform during its phase out is kicking the can down the road, but then again we do sequencing with the sequencers we have, not the sequencers we might wish to have at some point in the future...or something like that.
andylemire is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO