SEQanswers

Go Back   SEQanswers > General



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Roche 454 RL adapters.. help!!! Vartul 454 Pyrosequencing 3 09-11-2020 09:23 AM
Novomethyl comments Gen2007 Bioinformatics 6 04-20-2012 07:13 PM
Anyone using Roche's aligners? bbimber Bioinformatics 0 06-11-2010 08:51 AM
Roche Gs* software ulz_peter 454 Pyrosequencing 2 04-08-2010 01:12 AM
Roche software update 2.0.01.12 Tuxido 454 Pyrosequencing 16 10-27-2009 01:20 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-06-2012, 09:16 AM   #1
pmiguel
Senior Member
 
Location: Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,317
Default Roche's outrageous comments.

If you are following Roche's attempt to take over Illumina, GenomeWeb has posted a new article that includes the comment:

Quote:
Roche Chairman Franz Humer today said that the firm has "other options" if its bid to acquire Illumina fails.
and this one:

Quote:
"Illumina is not the only gene sequencing company, and there are other companies making quantum leaps in this field. Roche is also working on gene sequencing technologies of its own."
No kidding?!? It is called the GS-FLX! Why not pump that $5.7 billion into that platform instead of attempting to acquire a competitor! Instead of just letting it wither, like you are doing now...

--
Phillip
pmiguel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2012, 09:49 AM   #2
mediator
Member
 
Location: New England

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 27
Default

Because it is more profitable and less risk to acquire an existing technology than develop a new one.
mediator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012, 04:26 AM   #3
flxlex
Moderator
 
Location: Oslo, Norway

Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 415
Default

Apparently, they do have some new technology that they are working on in-house...
flxlex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 09:19 AM   #4
DaleYuzuki
Member
 
Location: Maryland USA

Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 12
Default

Great point Phillip - it was a $140M acquisition of 454 way back in 2007, and it makes you wonder what they got out of all that money.

I've heard they have launched some MDx products based upon FLX/Jr, but actions do speak loudly (as well as $5.7B).

Dale
DaleYuzuki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 03:57 PM   #5
RCJK
Senior Member
 
Location: Australia

Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 155
Default

It was mentioned in a Roche talk late last year that they are working on some sort of "molecular ratchet" technology. There was an image of what the guy was referring too as well. I'm not sure if this is what they're working with IBM on or not. Regardless, I'm sure it's years away from being any sort of commercial platform.
RCJK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2012, 07:57 PM   #6
scbaker
Shawn Baker
 
Location: San Diego

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 84
Default

They haven't said too much about their progress, but we've summarized what little there is here: http://blueseq.com/knowledgebank/eme...s/ibmroche454/

Basically, they're creating a solid state nanopore called a "DNA Transistor" by using layers of alternating materials which will allow for precise control of the speed (and direction) of molecules traveling through the pore. My guess is this is a few years away from commercialization (if ever).
scbaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO