![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how --mate-inner-dist and --mate-std-dev affect the tophat mapping result | liuxq | Bioinformatics | 0 | 11-06-2011 09:53 PM |
TopHat Error: you must set the mean inner distance between mates with -r? | xhuister | Bioinformatics | 2 | 02-24-2011 09:07 AM |
tophat -r mate inner distance option | ssseq | Bioinformatics | 2 | 01-10-2011 06:15 AM |
Tophat mean inner distance error for SOLID data | repinementer | Bioinformatics | 0 | 10-28-2010 07:58 PM |
How does inner distances(--mate-inner-dist and --mate-std-dev) work in tophat? | Gangcai | Bioinformatics | 4 | 06-15-2010 06:53 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Location: Kansas City Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 197
|
![]()
Does anyone have advice on what to use for the tophat -r parameter (mate inner distance)?
For example, if the lab cuts a ~200 fragment out of a gel, that includes 92 bases of adaptor, then I subtract two reads of 36, I come up with 36 for the mate inner distance. What did you use when you ran tophat, and what fragment size did your lab cut out of the gel? Alternatively, has anyone tried running tophat with different values for this parameter and compared the results? (I might try this). I see that there's a default 20 bp std deviation for mate inner distance. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
paired end, rnaseq, tophat |
Thread Tools | |
|
|