![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
problems with M13 universal tailed fusion PCR for 454 pyrosequencing | melcar | 454 Pyrosequencing | 8 | 08-11-2013 03:44 PM |
RNA-Seq: TopHat-Fusion: an algorithm for discovery of novel fusion transcripts. | Newsbot! | Literature Watch | 5 | 07-13-2013 01:02 AM |
poor amplification with fusion primers | Seqasaurus | 454 Pyrosequencing | 3 | 05-23-2013 07:20 AM |
454 Titanium 16S HMP primers? | cliffbeall | 454 Pyrosequencing | 9 | 05-11-2012 06:52 AM |
tophat fusion --fusion-min-dist | MerFer | Bioinformatics | 1 | 07-24-2011 08:09 PM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Oceania Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4
|
![]()
Hi there,
I am planning to use deep amplicon sequencing using 454 GS FLX Titanium series. The amplicons will be produced using conventional PCR with MID-labeled fusion primers. Because of the large number of samples to be pooled and analysed, this experiment will involve about 100 of MID-labeled fusion primers. The cost of HPLC purification for so many primers is quite substantial. How important is it to use HPLC purified compared to standard desalted primers in the initial PCR, provided that the PCR products will be subsequently size separated on a gel and purified using AMPure beads? Has anyone got any suggestions? Many thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Location: Montpellier, France Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 14
|
![]()
In our experience it is not important. We did not purify the fusion primers in previous experiments (this makes a total of around 2 500 primers distributed in 5 large projects). We did not detect any loss for a specific combination.
Good luck with your project ! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Location: Oceania Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4
|
![]()
Thanks Martinjf!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|