![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
best primers for 16S amplicon sequencing | dca | 454 Pyrosequencing | 9 | 09-11-2012 10:49 AM |
sequencing with specific primers | klytie | Illumina/Solexa | 0 | 08-04-2011 03:11 AM |
custom sequencing primers | athos | Illumina/Solexa | 5 | 02-04-2011 11:47 AM |
Searching for Bisulfite sequencing primers | aleferna | Bioinformatics | 3 | 08-09-2010 04:17 AM |
alignment of primers on the cp genome | Fonz | Bioinformatics | 1 | 05-07-2009 09:24 AM |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Location: Maryland Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6
|
![]()
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone knew of a company that will generate whole genome sequencing primers for ABI/Sanger sequencing given I provide them with a whole genome sequence of a reference. I am particularly interested in this for viral (and maybe bacterial) genomes. Thanks, Chris |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Location: Boston area Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 747
|
![]()
I don't offhand. It certainly is automatable.
Quick back-of-envelope calculation suggests even a Mycoplasma-class genome would be cheaper to do by SOLiD or Illumina. If you guesstimate 1 amplicon every 0.5 Kb, then a 1Mb genome is going to need 2000 amplicons. Cheap primers are $0.08/nt * 2 primers * 20 bases. So that's about $6K upfront for primers. And in the real world, some of those primer sets won't behave -- you'll either throw them out or grind out redoing them. If you assume $1/reaction for total costs, then those 2000 amplicons will be $4000 to do double-stranded. Even at 0.25/reaction, you're getting down to what a large project could probably get per sample for SOLiD/Illumina -- some of the newer library prep kits claim $100/reaction -- throw in another $200 for library prep costs not covered. If a SOLiD 4 run can pack in 100 genomes (which would probably still give you several hundred fold coverage of each sample) for $10K, that adds a per library data acquisition cost of $100. So around $500/sample should be doable by 2nd gen. Small viruses are probably a different story. Even there, depending on the number of samples you might be better off multiplexing libraries and pooling on a 2nd gen instrument OR doing your PCRs with barcoding primers and using a 2nd gen instrument. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
|
|