Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • RRBS NGS library prep

    I am trying to prepare RRBS sequencing libraries with the NEBNext® DNA Library Prep Master Mix Set for Illumina® kit and NEBNext® Multiplex Oligos for Illumina® (Methylated Adaptor) kit. I used 5 ug starting DNA for each sample. However, I encounter several problems and I hope to find answers here.
    1. I used AMPure XP beads for sample clean up as suggested by the NEB protocol. Generally, the recovery rate for each clean up was above 85% except for the step after dA-tailing of end-repair product. The recovery rate was always below 45%. I repeated this step several times and the yield was the same. Is there something in the buffer or dA-tailing enzyme that inhibits bead binding efficiency? Can I improve the yield by adding more beads than 1.8X as suggested by the NEB DNA Library Prep protocol?

    2. The RRBS protocol that comes with the NEBNext® Multiplex Oligos for Illumina does not select proper size of DNA after adaptor ligation. I tried the dual bead-based size selection as suggested in the NEB DNA Library Prep protocol, but I am not able to recover any DNA with insert size of 100 or 200 bp. Does anyone have a working bead-based size selection protocol for RRBS? Does gel selection (3% Nusieve 3-1 agarose gel) or bead selection work better?

    Thank you and I look forward to your answers!

  • #2
    I meet the same issue, have you figured out how to solve it, please?

    Comment


    • #3
      I don't know what is happening with your post A-tailing cleanup, but when size selecting for RRBS you need to keep in mind that only ~1% of your sample will be in the 220-320bp (100-200bp insert) range so a very low recovery rate is expected.

      In my experience using beads produces a better yield than gel selecting, but both will work.
      Josh Kinman

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by jdk787 View Post
        I don't know what is happening with your post A-tailing cleanup, but when size selecting for RRBS you need to keep in mind that only ~1% of your sample will be in the 220-320bp (100-200bp insert) range so a very low recovery rate is expected.

        In my experience using beads produces a better yield than gel selecting, but both will work.
        I don' t understand how do you use beads instead of gel selecting, do you mean to use beads to purify the selected gel fragment but not use the column in the kit?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by reprogrammer View Post
          I don' t understand how do you use beads instead of gel selecting, do you mean to use beads to purify the selected gel fragment but not use the column in the kit?
          I mean using only beads to perform the size-selection instead of using a gel at all.

          This blog post explains the process of size selection with beads pretty well.
          Someone recently asked me, “how do SPRI beads work” and I realized I was not completely sure so I went to find out. My lab uses kits. Lots...
          Josh Kinman

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • seqadmin
            Essential Discoveries and Tools in Epitranscriptomics
            by seqadmin


            The field of epigenetics has traditionally concentrated more on DNA and how changes like methylation and phosphorylation of histones impact gene expression and regulation. However, our increased understanding of RNA modifications and their importance in cellular processes has led to a rise in epitranscriptomics research. “Epitranscriptomics brings together the concepts of epigenetics and gene expression,” explained Adrien Leger, PhD, Principal Research Scientist on Modified Bases...
            Yesterday, 07:01 AM
          • seqadmin
            Current Approaches to Protein Sequencing
            by seqadmin


            Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...
            04-04-2024, 04:25 PM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
          0 responses
          55 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
          0 responses
          52 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
          0 responses
          45 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
          0 responses
          55 views
          0 likes
          Last Post seqadmin  
          Working...
          X